Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:02:08.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Linear Programming Approach to Bond Portfolio Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ehud I. Ronn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper derives and tests a new linear programming (LP) approach to bond portfolio management. The model elicits possible tax-clientele effects in the pricing of U.S. Government coupon bonds and simultaneously derives the optimal tax-specific bond portfolio. Analytically, the model derives these results by exploiting, for a given tax bracket, the price differential of an after-tax stream of cash flows. It accomplishes this objective by purchasing at the ask price “underpriced” bonds (for the specific tax bracket), while simultaneously selling at the bid price “overpriced” bonds. The model requires that the net cash flow, inclusive of purchased and sold bonds, be nonnegative at all future dates; the problem's formulation standardizes the position taken in each bond to a maximum of one unit. One of the model's appealing features is the parsimonious number of required calculations: only one LP program need be run per tax bracket. In addition to obtaining an “optimally” chosen tax-specific bond portfolio, the model also measures the after-tax term structure of spot U.S. Government interest rates for both tax-exempt and taxable investors. Finally, the superior monthly holding-period rates of return on the optimal taxspecific bond portfolio demonstrate an important property of the model's output.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 439 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Carleton, W. T., and Cooper, I. A.. “Estimation and Uses of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Finance, 31 (09 1976), 1067–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Constantidines, G., and Ingersoll, J. Jr “Optimal Bond Trading with Personal Taxes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (09 1984), 299–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Hodges, S. D., and Schaefer, S. M.. “A Model for Bond Portfolio Improvement.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12 (06 1977), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Kanemasu, H.; Litzenberger, R. H.; and Rolfo, J.. “Yield Curve Estimation and the Pricing of Pure Discount Bonds.” Working Paper, Stanford University (12 1984).Google Scholar
[5]Litzenberger, R. H., and Rolfo, J.. “Arbitrage Pricing Transaction Costs and Taxation of Capital Gains.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (09 1984), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Macaulay, F. R. “Some Theoretical Problems Suggested by the Movements of Interest Rates, Bond Yields and Stock Prices in the United States since 1856.” New York, NY: NBER (1938), 44–53.Google Scholar
[7]McCulloch, J. H. “Measuring the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Business, 44 (01 1971), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]McCulloch, J. H. “The Tax-Adjusted Yield Curve.” Journal of Finance, 30 (06 1975), 811–830.Google Scholar
[9]Schaefer, S. M. “Measuring Tax-Specific Term Structure of Interest Rates in the Market for British Government Securities.” Economic Journal, 91 (03 1981), 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]McCulloch, J. H. “Taxes and Security Market Equilibrium.” Financial Economics: Essays in Honor of Paul H. Cootner. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (1982).Google Scholar
[11]McCulloch, J. H. “Tax Induced Clientele Effects in the Market for British Government Securities.” Journal of Financial Economics, 10 (07 1982), 121–159.Google Scholar