Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:46:31.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretation of contrastive pitch accent in six- to eleven-year-old English-speaking children (and adults)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

KIWAKO ITO ,
SARAH A. BIBYK ,
LAURA WAGNER  and
SHARI R. SPEER
KIWAKO ITO*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
SARAH A. BIBYK
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
LAURA WAGNER
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
SHARI R. SPEER
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
*
Address for correspondence: Kiwako Ito, Ohio State University – Linguistics, 1712 Neil Ave, 222 Oxley Hall, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both off-line and on-line comprehension studies suggest not only toddlers and preschoolers, but also older school-age children have trouble interpreting contrast-marking pitch prominence. To test whether children achieve adult-like proficiency in processing contrast-marking prosody during school years, an eye-tracking experiment examined the effect of accent on referential resolution in six- to eleven-year-old children and adults. In all age groups, a prominent accent facilitated the detection of a target in contrastive discourse sequences (pink cat→green cat), whereas it led to a garden path in non-contrastive sequences (pink rabbit→green monkey: the initial fixations were on rabbits). While the data indicate that children as young as age six immediately interpret contrastive accent, even the oldest child group showed delayed fixations compared to adults. We argue that the children's slower recovery from the garden path reflects the gradual development in cognitive flexibility that matures independently of general oculomotor control.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 84 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

We thank the Columbus Center of Science and Industry (COSI) for permitting the recruitment of their visitors and the children and parents who came to the Ohio State University campus to participate in the experiment. We are grateful to Ping Bai for her assistance with data analysis.

References

REFERENCES

Afshordi, N., Weisleder, A. & Fernald, A. (2011). Responses to felicitous/infelicitous uses of contrastive stress in online processing of adjective–noun phrase by 36-month-olds. Poster presented at 2011 Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis, 2nd ed.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1988). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 38, 419–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of Executive Function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology 8(2), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, J. E. (2008). THE BACON not the bacon: how children and adults understand accented and unaccented noun phrases. Cognition 108, 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E., Hirschberg, J. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun, S.-A. (ed.), Prosodic typology; the phonology of intonation and phrasing, 9–54. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (2010). Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, S. & Clifton, C. Jr. (1995). Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension. Language and Speech 38, 365–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birch, S. & Clifton, C. Jr. (2002). Effects of varying focus and accenting of adjuncts on the comprehension of utterances. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 571–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. & Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: some consequences for comprehension. Memory and Cognition 11, 64–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (1992–2010). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1961). Contrastive accent and contrastive stress. Language 37, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1975). The development of memory: knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In Reese, H. W. (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior: 10, 103–52. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In Li, C. (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Y.-G. & Trueswell, J. C. (2006). Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 106, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conboy, B. T., Sommerville, J. A. & Kuhl, P. K. (2008). Cognitive control factors in speech perception at 11 months. Developmental Psychology 44, 1505–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1985). Intonation comprehension in ten-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 13, 643–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K. & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 292–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C. & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia 44, 2037–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempster, F. N. (1985). Short-term memory development in childhood and adolescence. In Brainerd, C. J. & Pressley, M. (eds.), Basic processes in memory development: progress in cognitive development research, 209–48. New York: Springer-Velag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A. (1995). Evidence of robust recognition memory early in life even when assessed by reaching behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 59, 419–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhard, K. M., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Sedivy, J. C. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1995). Eye movements as a window in to real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24, 409–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gundel, J. K. (1999). On different kinds of focus. In Bosch, P. & van der Sandt, R. (eds.), Focus: linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives, 43–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ito, K. (2002). The interaction of focus and lexical pitch accent in speech production and dialogue comprehension: evidence from Japanese and Basque. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Ito, K., Jincho, N., Minai, U., Yamane, N. & Mazuka, R. (2012). Intonation facilitates contrast resolution: evidence from Japanese adults and 6-year olds. Journal of Memory and Language 66(1), 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, K. & Speer, S. R. (2008). Anticipatory effect of intonation: eye movements during instructed visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 541–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, K. & Speer, S. R. (2011). Semantically-independent but contextually-dependent interpretation of contrastive accent. In Frota, S., Elordieta, G. & Prieto, P. (eds.), Prosodic categories: production, perception and comprehension, 69–92. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 434–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2008). Quantitative methods in linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kovacs, A. M. & Mehler, J. (2009). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(16), 6556–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladd, R. D. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lamm, C., Zelazo, P. D. & Lewis, M. D. (2006). Neural correlates of cognitive control in childhood and adolescence: disentangling the contributions of age and executive function. Neuropsychologia 44, 2139–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazuka, R., Jincho, N. & Oishi, H. (2009). Development of executive control and language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1), 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24, 167–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minai, U., Jincho, N., Yamane, N. & Mazuka, R. (2012). What hinders child semantic computation: children's universal quantification and the development of cognitive control. Journal of Child Language 39(5), 919–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, P., Morgan, J. & Pollack, M. (eds.), Intentions in communication, 342–65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I. E. & Trueswell, J. C. (2012). Interactive processing of contrastive expressions by Russian children. First Language 32(1/2), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedeker, J. & Yuan, S. (2008). Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language 58, 574–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M. & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73, 89–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viviani, P. (1990). Eye movements in visual search: cognitive, perceptual, and motor control aspects. In Kowler, K. (ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes, 353–93. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Watson, D. G., Tanenhaus, M. K. & Gunlogson, C. A. (2008). Interpreting pitch accents in online comprehension: H* vs. L + H*. Cognitive Science 32, 1232–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, A., Braun, B. & Crocker, M. W. (2006). Finding referents in time: eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents. Language and Speech 49(3), 367–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, B., Peppé, S. & Goulandris, N. (2004). Intonation development from five to thirteen. Journal of Child Language 31, 749–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelazo, P. D., Craik, F. I. M. & Booth, L. (2004). Executive function across the life span. Acta Psychologica 115, 167–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelazo, P. D. & Frye, D. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control: the development of executive function. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7, 121–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. D. & Müller, U. (2011). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In Goswami, U. (ed.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development, 574–603. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar