Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:21:04.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A population-based study of inter-generational attitudes towards consanguineous marriages in north-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2019

Shirley O. A. Lima ,
Allysson A. Farias ,
Victor A. Albino ,
Yanna K. Marques-Alves ,
Ricardo Olinda ,
Tais A. Santos-Silva ,
Leandro U. Alves ,
Mayana Zatz  and
Silvana Santos Open the ORCID record for Silvana Santos [Opens in a new window]
Shirley O. A. Lima
Affiliation:
Community Genetics Group, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Brazil
Allysson A. Farias
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Victor A. Albino
Affiliation:
Community Genetics Group, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Brazil
Yanna K. Marques-Alves
Affiliation:
Community Genetics Group, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Brazil
Ricardo Olinda
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Brazil
Tais A. Santos-Silva
Affiliation:
Faculté des Letres, Sorbonne Universités Paris-Sorbonne, France
Leandro U. Alves
Affiliation:
Community Genetics Group, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Brazil Department of Genetics, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Mayana Zatz
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Silvana Santos*
Affiliation:
Community Genetics Group, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate beliefs, attitudes and reproductive behaviours in relation to consanguinity in a population living in the backlands of north-eastern Brazil. Data were collected by face-to-face interview from 147 high school students aged 13–20 years and from 532 elderly individuals aged 60 years and over from Brejo dos Santos in the state of Paraíba in 2017. The frequency of consanguineous marriage was found to have increased over the generations, being 15.9% in the parents of the elderly participants, 17.1% in the elderly participants themselves and 20.5% in their descendants. Although 258 (50.9%) of the elderly interviewees opposed consanguineous union, 341 (65.3%) would approve of the marriage of their children with relatives. Both the young (n=108 or 78.3%) and elderly (n=398 or 80.4%) interviewees believed that consanguineous marriages were no more durable than non-consanguineous marriages (p=0.578). Additionally, 408 (82.4%) of the elderly individuals and 108 (80.6%) of the students recognized that spouses in consanguineous unions experience conflicts, just like other couples do (p=0.625). In both groups, the majority of the participants did not believe that consanguinity increased the risk of having children with disabilities. The regression of the two continuous variables ‘age’ and ‘positive attitudes score’ showed a significant correlation, suggesting that younger individuals are more susceptible to the influence of cultural factors contributing to consanguinity, such as the opinions of their parents and grandparents. The belief that consanguineous unions are more durable showed a significant difference between elderly individuals in consanguineous and non-consanguineous unions (p=0.001); the former were 2.42 more likely to believe that marriages between relatives contributes to marriage durability.

Keywords

ConsanguinityMarriage and Mate SelectionHuman Population Biology
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 51 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 683 - 697
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, AE, Alharbi, OA, Al-Hamam, AA, Al-Shaia, WA, Al-Marzoug, HM and Bagha, M (2016) Awareness of health consequences of consanguineous marriages among Saudi Adults. Journal of Public Health in Developing Countries 2(1), 121–129.Google Scholar
Alharbi, OA, Al-Shaia, W, Al-Hamam, AA, Al-Marzoug, HM, Ahmed, AE and Bagha, M (2015) Attitude of Saudi Arabian adults towards consanguineous marriage. Qatar Medical Journal 12 (2), 1–8.Google Scholar
Alnaqeb, D, Hamamy, H, Youssef, AM and Al-Rubeaan, K (2016) Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards consanguineous marriages among a cohort of multiethnic health care providers in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Biosocial Science 50, 1–18.Google Scholar
Alves, LU, Santos, S, Musso, CM, Ezquina, SAM, Opitz, JM, Kok, F et al. (2017) Santos syndrome is caused by mutation in the WNT7A gene. Journal of Human Genetics 62, 1073.Google Scholar
Aragon, T (2008) Epitools: Epidemiology Tools. R Package Version 0. 5-2. URL http://www.medepi.com.Google Scholar
Bhopal, RS, Petherick, ES, Wright, J and Small, N (2013) Potential social, economic and general health benefits of consanguineous marriage: results from the Born in Bradford cohort study. European Journal of Public Health 24, 862–869.Google Scholar
Bittles, AH (2008) A community genetics perspective on consanguineous marriage. Community Genetics 11, 324–330.Google Scholar
Bittles, AH (2012) Consanguinity and reproductive behaviour. In Bittles AH (ed.) Consanguinity in Context, pp. 93–111. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139015844.007.Google Scholar
Bittles, AH and Black, ML (2010) Consanguineous marriage and human evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology 39, 193–207.Google Scholar
Castilla, E and Schuler-Faccini, L (2014) From rumors to genetic isolates. Genetics and Molecular Biology 37, 186–193.Google Scholar
Çiçeklioğlu, M, Ergin, I, Demirelöz, M, Ceber, E and Nazlı, A (2012) Sociodemographic aspects of consanguineous marriage in an urban slum of a metropolitan area in İzmir, Turkey. Annals of Human Biology 40, 139–145.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, T, Melo, US, Pessoa, ALS, Nobrega, PR, Kitajima, JP, Correa, I et al. (2015) Homozygous missense mutation in MED25 segregates with syndromic intellectual disability in a large consanguineous family. Journal of Medical Genetics 52, 123–127.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, T, Melo, US, Pessoa, ALS, Nobrega, PR, Kitajima, JP, Rusch, H et al. (2016) A homozygous loss-of-function mutation in inositol monophosphatase 1 (IMPA1) causes severe intellectual disability. Molecular Psychiatry 21, 1125–1129.Google Scholar
Freire-Maia, N (1957) Inbreeding in Brazil. American Journal of Human Genetics 9, 284–298.Google Scholar
Grjibovski, AM, Magnus, P and Stoltenberg, C (2009) Decrease in consanguinity among parents of children born in Norway to women of Pakistani origin: a registry-based study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 37, 232–238.Google Scholar
Harkness, G and Khaled, R (2014) Modern traditionalism: consanguineous marriage in Qatar. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling 76, 587–603.Google Scholar
Islam, MM (2017) Consanguineous marriage in Oman: understanding the community awareness about congenital effects of and attitude towards consanguineous marriage. Annals of Human Biology 44(3), 273–286.Google Scholar
Joseph, N, Pavan, KK, Ganapathi, K, Apoorva, P, Sharma, P and Jhamb, JA (2014) Health awareness and consequences of consanguineous marriages. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 6, 121–127.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
Lopes, FRL, Monteiro, KS, Figueiredo, T, Wanderley, TC, Pequeno, TA, Lima, S and Santos, S (2017) Reliability of information on people with disabilities gathered by community health workers in highly consanguineous communities of Northeastern Brazil. BMC Health Services Research 17, 317–326.Google Scholar
Macedo-Souza, LI, Kok, F, Santos, S, Amorim, SC, Starling, A, Nishimura, A et al. (2005) Spastic paraplegia, optic atrophy, and neuropathy is linked to chromosome 11q13. Annals of Neurology 57, 730–737.Google Scholar
Melo, US, Macedo-Souza, LI, Figueiredo, T, Muotri, AR, Gleeson, JG, Coux, G et al. (2015) Overexpression of KLC2 due to a homozygous deletion in the non-coding region causes SPOAN syndrome. Human Molecular Genetics 24, 6877–6885.Google Scholar
Melo, US, Santos, S, Cavalcanti, HG, Andrade, WT, Dantas, VG, Rosa, MR and Mingroni-Netto, RC (2014) Strategies for genetic study of hearing loss in the Brazilian northeastern region. International Journal of Molecular Epidemiology and Genetics 5, 11–21.Google Scholar
Neri, M, Pinto, A, Soares, W and Costilla, H (2003) Retratos da deficiência no Brasil. Fundação Getulio Vargas/Instituto Brasileiro de Economia - Centro de Políticas Sociais, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Passos-Bueno, MR, Bertola, D, Horovitz, DDG, Ferraz, VEF and Brito, LA (2014) Genetics and genomics in Brazil: a promising future. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine 2, 280–291.Google Scholar
Pervaiz, R, Faisal, F and Serakinci, N (2018) Practice of consanguinity and attitudes towards risk in the Pashtun population of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science 50, 414–420.Google Scholar
Sandridge, AL, Takeddin, J, Al-Kaabi, E and Frances, Y (2009) Consanguinity in Qatar: knowledge, attitude and practice in a population born between 1946 and 1991. Journal of Biosocial Science 42, 59–82.Google Scholar
Santos, S (2006) The diversity of everyday ideas about inherited disorders. Public Understanding of Science 15, 259–275.Google Scholar
Santos, S and Bizzo, N (2005) From “new genetics” to everyday knowledge: ideas about how genetic diseases are transmitted in two large Brazilian families. Science Education 89, 564–576.Google Scholar
Santos, S, Melo, US, Lopes, SSS, Weller, M and Kok, F (2013b) Could endogamy explain the higher prevalence of disabilities in the population of the Brazilian Northeast? Ciencia & Saúde Coletiva 18, 1141–1150.Google Scholar
Santos, SC, Pardono, E, Costa, MIF, Melo, AN, Graciani, Z, Souza, ACA et al. (2008) A previously undescribed syndrome combining fibular agenesis/hypoplasia, oligodactylous clubfeet, anonychia/ungual hypoplasia, and other defects. American Journal of Medical Genetics 146A, 3126–3131.Google Scholar
Santos, S, Pequeno, AAS, Galvão, CRC, Pessoa, ALS, Almeida, EDS, Pereira, JC et al. (2014) The causes of physical disability in municipalities of the northeast of Brazil and an estimate of costs of specialized services. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva 19, 559–568.Google Scholar
Santos, S, Pequeno, AAS, Pessoa, A, Galvão, CRC, Medeiros, JLA, Mathias, W and Kok, F (2013a) Increased prevalence of inherited neuromuscular disorders due to endogamy in Northeast Brazil: the need of community genetics services. Journal of Community Genetics. 5(3), 199–203.Google Scholar
Small, N, Bittles, AH, Petherick, ES and Wright, J (2016) Endogamy, consanguinity and health implications of changing marital choices in the UK Pakistani Community. Journal of Biosocial Science 49, 435–446.Google Scholar
The R Development Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://softlibre.unizar.es/manuales/aplicaciones/r/fullrefman.pdf (accessed 3rd December 2018).Google Scholar
Warsy, AS, Al-Jaser, MH, Albdass, A, Al-Daihan, S and Alanazi, M (2014) Is consanguinity prevalence decreasing in Saudis? A study in two generations. African Health Sciences 14, 314.Google Scholar
Weller, M and Santos, S (2013) A positive association between consanguinity and fertility in communities of Paraíba, Northeast Brazil. Annals of Human Biology 40, 527–530.Google Scholar
Weller, M, Tanieri, M, Pereira, JC, Almeida, EDS, Kok, F and Santos, S (2012) Consanguineous unions and the burden of disability: a population-based study in communities of Northeastern Brazil. American Journal of Human Biology 24, 835–840.Google Scholar