Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:04:18.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

We the Judges: Studies in American and Indian Constitutional Law from Marshall to Mukherjea. By William O. Douglas. New York: Doubleday, 1956. 480. Index. $6.00.

Review products

We the Judges: Studies in American and Indian Constitutional Law from Marshall to Mukherjea. By William O. Douglas. New York: Doubleday, 1956. 480. Index. $6.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Lawrence F. Ebb
Lawrence F. Ebb
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , August 1956 , pp. 614 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa, [1952] All India Reporter, Bombay Section, 84.Google Scholar

2 At least three of the High Courts in India have put their stamp of approval on a passage from Julian Huxley's “Economic Man and Social Man,” which advocates a retranslation of the democratic idea of freedom to remove its nineteenth-century meaning of individual liberty in the economic sphere and adjust it to new conceptions of social duties and responsibilities. See Bezbarua v. State of Assam, [1954] Indian Law Reports, Assam Series, 166, 182–2Google Scholar; South Travancore Electrical Workers' Union v. Nagorcoil Electric Supply Corp., [1954] Indian Law Reports, Travancore-Cochin Series, 322, 332Google Scholar; Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. State of Madras, [1951] All India Reporter, Madras Section, 974, 979.Google Scholar

3 See Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd. v. State of Ajmer, [1955] All India Reporter, Supreme Court Section, 33, citing Article 43 in support of the constitutionality of minimum wage legislation.

4 See, e.g., discussion of Adair v. United States, Lochner v. New York, and Coppage v. Kansas in East India Industries (Madras) Ltd. v. The Industrial Tribunal, Fort St. George, [1955] All India Reporter, Madras Section, 242.Google Scholar

5 3rd. ed. Calcutta: S. C. Sarkar & Sons Ltd., 1955.

6 Madras: The Srinivasa Sastri Institute of Politics, 1955.