Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:27:01.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kyoto: An Urban History of Japan's Premodern Capital. By Matthew Stavros. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2014. xxv, 229 pp. ISBN: 978082483879 (cloth).

Review products

Kyoto: An Urban History of Japan's Premodern Capital. By Matthew Stavros. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2014. xxv, 229 pp. ISBN: 978082483879 (cloth).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2016

Mikael Adolphson
Mikael Adolphson*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews—Japan
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 524 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

11 The author cites volume 1, but likely meant to refer to chapter 1 of volume 2.

12 Ihara Keaso, Nihon chūsei no kokusei to kasei [State rulership and family governance in medieval Japan] (Tokyo: Azekura shobō, 1995). For a critique of Ihara's interpretation, see, e.g., Endō Motoo, Chūsei ōken to ōchō girei [Medieval royal authority and court ceremonies] (Tokyo: San'yōsha, 2008).

13 See, e.g., Kuroda Toshio, Jisha seiryoku: Mō hitotsu chūsei no shakai [The secular power of temples and shrines: Another medieval society] (Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1980). Oddly enough, while Stavros refers to kenmon on numerous occasions, Kuroda's works are not mentioned.

14 Keirstead, Thomas questions the use of “medieval” in the Japanese context in his “Inventing Medieval Japan: The History and Politics of National Identity,” Medieval History Journal 1, no. 1 (1998): 25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 For recent critiques of applying the feudal paradigm to Japan, see, e.g., Mikael Adolphson, “Social Change and Contained Transformations: Warriors and Merchants in Japan, 1000–1300,” in Eurasian Transformations, Tenth to Thirteenth Centuries: Crystallizations, Divergences, Renaissances, eds. Johann P. Arnason and Björn Wittrock (Leiden: Brill, 2004), 309–37; and Friday, Karl, “The Futile Paradigm: In Quest of Feudalism in Early Medieval Japan,” History Compass 8, no. 2 (2010): 179–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a Japanese critique, see Hotate Michihisa, Rekishigaku o mitsumenaosu: Hōkensei gainen no hōki [Reflecting on the discipline of history: The renunciation of the concept of feudalism] (Tokyo: Azekura shobō, 2004). In Europe, Susan Reynolds's study, Fiefs and Vassals: The Medieval Evidence Reintepreted (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), launched a scathing critique of the assumptions underlying the use of the feudal paradigm. See also Hyams, Paul, “The Death of Feudalism,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 27, no. 4 (1997): 655–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.