Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:55:06.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tokyo Judgment and the Rape of Nanking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Timothy Brook
Get access

Extract

The japanese assault on the city of nanking in December 1937 was one of many incidents that the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE, 1946–48) examined in the course of judging the wartime leaders of Japan. What was referred to at the time as the “Rape of Nanking” has in the last several decades become a controversial marker of Chinese identity as well as a source of potent disagreement among Japanese over their nation's history as a colonial power in East Asia. Within this controversy, the IMTFE trial in Tokyo has been used as a touchstone to confirm and deny all manner of claims concerning the incident. Those who feel aggrieved over Japan's conduct toward China cite the evidence produced at the trial to authenticate the scale and brutality of the massacre (Eykholt 2000, 19–23). Those who feel that Japan and the emperor system have been unfairly blamed for the war in East Asia scour the trial proceedings for failures of logic and evidence that demonstrate to their satisfaction that the “Tokyo trial view of history” is nothing but anti-Japanese distortion and fabrication (Yoshida 2000, 111–14). For both sides, the Tokyo judgment is fuel for ideological fire.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , August 2001 , pp. 673 - 700
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Basu, K.K. 1949. “Tokio Trials.” Indian Law Review 3 (1): 25–30.Google Scholar
Yves, Beigbeder. 1999. Judging War Criminals: The Politics of International Justice. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bix, Herbert P. 2000. Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Boulesbaa, Ahcene. 1999. The U.N. Convention on Torture and the Prospects for Enforcement. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackman, Arnold C. 1987. The Other Nuremberg: The Untold Story of the Tokyo War Crimes Trials. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Brode, Patrick. 1997. Casual Slaughters and Accidental Judgments: Canadian War Crimes Prosecutions, 1944–1948. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook, Timothy, ed. 1999. Documents on the Rape of Nanking. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook, Timothy, and Wakabayashi, Bob Tadashi, eds. 2000. Opium Regimes: China, Britain, and Japan, 1839–1952. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Iris. 1997. The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, David. 1999. “Beyond Nuremberg: Individual Responsibility for War Crimes.” In Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia, edited by Hesse, Carla and Post, Robert. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Dower, John. 1999. Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Evans, Harold. 1947. “The Trial of Major Japanese War Criminals.” 4 parts. New Zealand Law Journal 23: 8–10, 21–23, 37–38, 322–24 (21 January, 4 February, 18 February, 2 December).Google Scholar
Eykholt, Mark. 2000. “Aggression, Victimization, and Chinese Historiography of the Nanjing Massacre.” In The Nanjing Massacre in History and Historiography, edited by Fogel, Joshua A.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ginn, John L. 1992. Sugamo Prison, Tokyo: An Account of the Trial and Sentencing of Japanese War Criminals in 1948. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Co.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Richard J. 2001. “The Enduring Legacy of the Holocaust: The Response of International Law.” Address delivered at the conference “The Holocaust in the Courtroom: Historical Reflections on the Irving Trial.” Toronto, 25 January.Google Scholar
Xiaohua, Guo. 1995. Dongfang dashenpan: shenpan qin Hua Rijun zhanfan jishi [The Far East tribunals: records of the judgments of Japanese war criminals in China]. Beijing: Jiefangjun wenyi chubanshe.Google Scholar
Hesse, Carla, and Post, Robert. 1999. “Introduction” to Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Solis. 1950. “The Tokyo Trial.” International Conciliation 45 (November): 473–584.Google Scholar
Chiro, Hosoya, Nisuke, Ando, Yasuaki, Ōnuma and Minear, Richard, eds. 1986. The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: An International Symposium. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Shu-hsi, Hsü. 1939. Documents from the Nanking Safety Zone. Shanghai: Kelly and Walsh.Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal For The Far East (IMTFE). 1946. “Indictment.” Photoreproduced in The Tokyo War Crimes Trial, edited by Pritchard, John and Zaide, Sonia, vol. 1. New York: Garland Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal For The Far East (IMTFE). 1946–1948. “Proceedings.” Photoreproduced in The Tokyo War Crimes Trial, edited by Pritchard, R. John and Zaide, Sonia, vols. 1–19. New York: Garland Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal For The Far East (IMTFE). 1948a. “Judgment.” Photoreproduced in The Tokyo War Crimes Trial, edited by Pritchard, R. John and Zaide, Sonia, vol. 20. New York: Garland Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal For The Far East (IMTFE). 1948b. “Summation for Matsui, Iwane.” Defense Document no. 3096, IMTFE. Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Takeshi, Iwakawa. 1995. Kotōno tsuchi to naru tomo: BC kyūsenpan saiban [Even if I were to become a desert island: The judgments on B- and C-class war criminals]. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Jaranilla, Delfin. 1948. “Concurring Opinion of Mr. Justice Jaranilla, Member from the Republic of the Philippines.” Photoreproduced in The Tokyo War Crimes Trial, edited by Pritchard, R. John and Zaide, Sonia, vol. 21. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Kopelman, Elizabeth S. 1991. “Ideology and International Law: The Dissent of the Indian Justice at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 23 (2): 373–444.Google Scholar
Lewis, John R. 1979. Uncertain Judgment: A Bibliography of War Crimes Trials. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.Google Scholar
Liu, James T. C. 1947. “The Tokyo Trial.” 2 pts. China Monthly 8: 242–47; 279–80.Google Scholar
Minear, Richard. 1971. Victor's Justice: The Tokyo War Crimes Trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis. 1983. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis. 1996. “The Other Within: The Strange Case of Radhabinod Pal's Judgment of Culpability.” In The Savage Freud and Other Essays on Possible and Retrievable Selves. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark. 1997. Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory, and the Law. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark. 1999. “Making Public Memory, Publically.” In Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia, edited by Hesse, Carla and Post, Robert. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Pal, Radhabinod. 1948. “Judgment of the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pal, Member from India.” Photoreproduced in The Tokyo War Crimes Trial, edited by Pritchard, R. John and Zaide, Sonia, vol. 21. New York: Garland Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar
Pal, Radhabinod. 1949. “International Law.” Indian Law Review 3 (1): 31–60.Google Scholar
Pal, Radhabinod. 1952a. Nihon muzairon: shinri no sabaki [Japan is not guilty: the verdict of truth]. Translated by Masaaki, Tanaka. Tokyo: Taiheiyō shuppansha.Google Scholar
Pal, Radhabinod. 1952b. Zenyaku: Nihon muzairon [The complete translation: Japan is not guilty]. Translated by Masaaki, Tanaka. Tokyo: Nihon shobō. Republished 1966 (Tōkyō saiban kenkyūkai), 1984 (Kodansha), and 1999 (Kokusho kankökai).Google Scholar
Pal, Radhabinod. 1953. International Military Tribunal for the Far East: Dissentient Judgment. Calcutta: Sanyal.Google Scholar
Pal, Radhabinod. 1955. Crimes in International Relations. Calcutta: University of Calcutta Press.Google Scholar
Pal, Radhabinod. 1966. At rabu Japan: Pāru hakase genkōroku [I love Japan: a record of Dr. Pal's visit]. edited by jimukyoju, Pāru hakase kangei. Tokyo: Tōkyō saiban kankōkai.Google Scholar
Piccigallo, Philip. 1979. The Japanese on Trial: Allied War Crimes Operations in the East, 1945–1951. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Quentin-Baxter, R. Q. 1949. “The Task of the International Military, Tribunal at Tokyo.” New Zealand Law Journal 25 (7 June): 133–38.Google Scholar
Riley, Walter. 1957. “The International Military Tribunal for the Far East and the Law of the Tribunal.” Ph.D. diss., University of Washington.Google Scholar
Röling, B. V. A. 1948. “Opinion of Mr. Justice Roling, Member for the Netherlands.” Photoreproduced in The Tokyo War Crimes Trial, edited by Pritchard, John and Zaide, Sonia, vol. 21. New York: Garland Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar
Röling, B. V. A. 1953. “The Tokyo Trial and the Development of International Law.” Indian Law Review 7 (1): 4–14.Google Scholar
Röling, B. V. A. 1977. “Introduction.” In The Tokyo Judgment: The International Military Tribunal for the Far East, 29 April 1946–12 November 1948, edited with Rüter, C. F.. 3 vols. Amsterdam: AAPA-University Press.Google Scholar
Röling, B. V. A. 1993. The Tokyo Trial and Beyond: Reflections of a Peacemonger. Edited by Antonio Cassese. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Ranjit. 1997. The Twin in the Twist: Bose and Gandhi. Delhi: Asia Pacific Research Information.Google Scholar
Stanton, John. 2000. “Canada and War Crimes: Judgment at Tokyo.” International Journal 55(3): 376–400.Google Scholar
Masaaki, Tanaka. 2000. What Really Happened in Nanking: The Refutation of a Common Myth. Tokyo: Sekai shuppan.Google Scholar
Taylor, Laurence. 1981. A Trial of Generals: Homma, Yamashita, Mac Arthur. South Bend, Ind.: Icarus.Google Scholar
United Nations War Crimes Commission (UNWCC). 1948. History of the United Nations War Crimes Commission and the Development of the Laws of War. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Yang, Daqing. 2000. “The Challenges of the Nanjing Massacre: Reflections on Historical Inquiry.” In The Nanjing Massacre in History and Historiography, edited by Fogel, Joshua A.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yoshida, Takashi. 2000. “A Battle over History: The Nanjing Massacre in Japan.” In The Nanjing Massacre in History and Historiography, edited by Fogel, Joshua A.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar