Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T11:59:28.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rome, China, and the Barbarians: Ethnographic Traditions and the Transformation of Empires. By Randolph B. Ford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. xx, 369 pp. ISBN: 9781108473958 (cloth).

Review products

Rome, China, and the Barbarians: Ethnographic Traditions and the Transformation of Empires. By Randolph B. Ford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. xx, 369 pp. ISBN: 9781108473958 (cloth).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2021

Shao-yun Yang*
Affiliation:
Denison University
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews—Transnational and Comparative
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc., 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Note, though, that the barbarians who emerged as the leaders of Western Europe, the Franks, also falsified a narrative of descent from the Trojans, thereby creating a genealogical link to Rome without compromising their Frankish identity. I thank Anthony Kaldellis for this insight.

2 Whether this changed for Sogdians after the An Lushan Rebellion (755–63) is a matter of debate that I shall not dwell on here, but my position is that it did not.

3 Skaff, Jonathan Karam, Sui-Tang China and Its Turko-Mongol Neighbors: Culture, Power, and Connections, 580–800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 910CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 52–60.

4 For example, Yang, Shao-yun, “‘What Do Barbarians Know of Gratitude?’—The Stereotype of Barbarian Perfidy and Its Uses in Tang Foreign Policy Rhetoric,” Tang Studies 31 (2013): 2874Google Scholar.

5 Rogers, Michael C., “The Myth of the Battle of the Fei River (A.D. 383),” T'oung Pao 54, no. 1 (1968): 5072CrossRefGoogle Scholar.