Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:15:07.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response by sugar beet to irrigation, 1965–75

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. P. Draycott  and
A. B. Messem
A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
A. B. Messem
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sugar yield increases from irrigation in 19 experiments on a sandy-loam soil at Broom's Barn over an 11-year period were examined in relation to rainfall and to both potential and measured soil moisture deficit. Irrigation increased average yield from 7·6 to 8·3 t sugar/ha and in six of the years significantly increased yield by more than 1 t sugar/ha (15%). The experiments also tested plant density, nitrogen, harvest date and time and amount of irrigation. Without irrigation, maximum sugar yield was from a density of 74000 plants/ha but larger densities gave slightly more yield when irrigated. Irrigation affected the magnitude of response to nitrogen but 100 kg N/ha gave the most profitable yield increase, both with and without irrigation. Yield increases of about 1 t sugar/ha (15%) between early and late harvesting were also independent of irrigation. Early irrigation of 25 mm and 50 mm in June and July respectively increased yield in 4 of the 5 years but in all years applications in late summer did not increase sugar yield. The main factors controlling the yield response to irrigation were period and size of deficit. The soil type and summer rainfall at Broom's Barn were compared with those in 36 other experiments at five localities between 1947 and 1973; yield increases at Broom's Barn were smaller, probably because the others were on lighter soils.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , October 1977 , pp. 481 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (1975). Sandland Irrigation. Report of the Gleadthorpe Experimental Husbandry Farm, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, p. 23.Google Scholar
Anon (1962). Irrigation. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Bulletin 138, p. 35. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Coppock, J. T. (1964). In An Agricultural Atlas of England and Wales, p. 32.Google Scholar
Dadd, C. V. (1963). Survey of irrigation practice, 1961. National Agricultural and Advisory Service Quarterly Review 57, 9–16.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1971). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. III. Water consumption. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Farley, R. F. (1971). Effect of sodium and magnesium fertilizers and irrigation on growth, composition and yield of sugar beet. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 559–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draycott, A. P. & Webb, D. J. (1971). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. I. Yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Messem, A. B. (1974). Effects of plant density, irrigation and potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. II. Influence of soil moisture and weather. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 261–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Webb, D. J. (1974). Effects of plant density, irrigation and potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. I. Yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 251–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, M. J. (1973). Growth and yield of sugar beet. M. I. Biol. thesis, p. 87.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. J., Love, B. J. G., Messem, A. B. & Draycott, A. P. (1973). Growth of crop roots in relation to soil moisture extraction. Annals of Applied Biology 74, 387–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, M. J., Messem, A. B. & Milford, G. F. J. (1976). Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1975, Part 1, p. 71.Google Scholar
French, B. K., Long, I. F. & Penman, H. L. (1973). Water use by farm crops. I. Test of the neutron meter on barley, beans and sugar beet, 1970. Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1972, Part 2, pp. 5–42.Google Scholar
Garner, H. V. (1950). Sugar beet irrigation. British Sugar Beet Review 18, 145–50.Google Scholar
Harris, P. M. (1972). The effect of plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P. N. & Wellings, L. W. (1970). Irrigation of sugar beet on light sand soil. Experimental Husbandry 19, 1–12.Google Scholar
Last, P. J. (1974). Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1973, Part 1, p. 271.Google Scholar
Last, P. J. (1975). Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1974, Part 1, p. 63.Google Scholar
Last, P. J. (1976). Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1975, Part 1, p. 70.Google Scholar
Long, I. F. & French, B. K. (1967). Measurement of soil moisture in the field by neutron moderation. Journal of Soil Science 18, 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J., Durrant, M. J. & Messem, A. B. (1976). Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1975, Part 1, p. 44.Google Scholar
Mohindra, M. K. (1975). The influence of plant population on crop water economy. Ph.D. thesis, Reading University.Google Scholar
North, J. J. (1960). Irrigation of farm crops. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society 121, 7–20.Google Scholar
Orchard, B. (1960). Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1959, Part 1, p. 77.Google Scholar
Owen, P. C. (1958). Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1957, Part 1, p. 89.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1952). Experiments on the irrigation of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 42, 286–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1962). Woburn Irrigation 1951–59. III. Results for rotation crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 365–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1970). Woburn Irrigation 1960–68. VI. Results for rotation crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T. J. A. & Harvey, P. N. (1962). Effect of irrigation on sugar beet and potatoes. Experimental Husbandry 7, 1–7.Google Scholar
Smith, L. P. (1967). Potential Transpiration. Technical Bulletin, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 16. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Smith, L. P. & Douglas, H. A. (1975). Theoretical considerations of the water loss by evaporation from bare soil and the effect of partial crop cover. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service Quarterly Review 16, 135–44. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar