Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T05:37:22.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A modified method for assessment of the morphological stage of development as a predictor of alfalfa herbage chemical composition and nutritive value

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2013

A. BOŽIČKOVIĆ ,
G. GRUBIĆ ,
J. VERBIČ ,
T. ŽNIDARŠIČ ,
N. DJORDJEVIĆ  and
B. STOJANOVIĆ
A. BOŽIČKOVIĆ*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11081 Zemun, Serbia
G. GRUBIĆ
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11081 Zemun, Serbia
J. VERBIČ
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica 17, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
T. ŽNIDARŠIČ
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica 17, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
N. DJORDJEVIĆ
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11081 Zemun, Serbia
B. STOJANOVIĆ
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11081 Zemun, Serbia
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of the current work was to investigate the possibility of modifying the existing mean stage by weight (MSW) system for evaluating the average development stage in alfalfa. The modification was performed with the aim of providing a simplified system that may be used to evaluate the alfalfa development stage and to predict its nutritive value for ruminants. The suggested modification consists of designating an MSW value on the basis of the fresh weight of all morphological stages in a fresh green plant, as opposed to the original method which is based on weighing all morphological stages dried at 65 °C. The investigation was done on 141 samples of one alfalfa cultivar, collected from the same location during the first three growth cycles: spring growth, the first and the second regrowth. On all collected samples the following characteristics were determined: MSW, modified MSW (mean stage by fresh weight (MSFW)), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), crude ash (CA) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD). For these characteristics of chemical composition (apart from CA) and nutritive value the regressions were calculated for their prediction based on MSW and MSFW. The regressions were derived for individual growth cycles and all cycles combined. A trend for an increase in the coefficient of determination (R2) was identified as well as a decrease in root-mean-square error (RMSE) for all equations derived for all investigated characteristics from the spring growth to the second regrowth. A deviation from this trend was observed only in equations derived for IVOMD. A very high correlation was observed between MSW and MSFW (r=0·999). The determined R2 and RMSE were very similar within the same growth cycle in all regressions for prediction of chemical composition and nutritive value derived for MSW and MSFW. Based on the results of this investigation the MSFW appears to be a quick and accurate method for determining the average development stage in alfalfa which can therefore be recommended for both scientific research and practical field use, as well as for prediction of its chemical composition and nutritive value.

Type
Animal Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 151 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 590 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S. J. & Fick, G. W. (1990). On-farm testing of mean stage by count as a predictor of alfalfa forage quality. In Agronomy Abstracts (Ed. ASA), p. 185. Madison, WI, USA: ASA.Google Scholar
AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis, 17th edn, Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Berg, B. P. (2000). An Evaluation of Initial Rates of Digestion in a Strain of Alfalfa Selected to Prevent Bloat in Grazing Ruminants. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Blümmel, M. & Ørskov, E. R. (1993). Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 40, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fick, G. W. & Mueller, S. C. (1989). Alfalfa; Quality, Maturity, and Mean Stage of Development. Information Bulletin 217. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Fick, G. W. & Onstad, D. W. (1988). Statistical models for predicting alfalfa herbage quality from morphological or weather data. Journal of Production Agriculture 1, 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fick, G. W., Wilkens, P. W. & Cherney, J. H. (1994). Modeling forage quality changes in the growing crop. In Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization (Eds Fahey, G. C. Jr., Collins, M., Mertens, D. R. & Moser, L. E.), pp. 757–795. Madison, WI, USA: ASA, CSSA, and SSSA.Google Scholar
Griffin, T. S., Cassida, K. A., Hesterman, O. B. & Rust, S. R. (1994). Alfalfa maturity and cultivar effects on chemical and in situ estimates of protein degradability. Crop Science 34, 1654–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakl, J., Šantrůček, J., Fuksa, P. & Krajíc, L. (2010). The use of indirect methods for the prediction of lucerne quality in the first cut under the conditions of Central Europe. Czech Journal of Animal Science 55, 258–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. H., Smiles, W. S. & Dickerson, R. A. (2000). Morphological development of alfalfa cultivars selected for higher quality. Agronomy Journal 92, 1077–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintz, R. W. & Albrecht, K. A. (1991). Prediction of alfalfa chemical composition from maturity and plant morphology. Crop Science 31, 1561–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (1999). ISO 6496: 1999, Animal Feeding Stuffs – Determination of Moisture and Other Volatile Matter Content. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (2005). ISO 5983-2: 2005, Animal Feeding stuffs – Determination of Nitrogen Content and Calculation of Crude Protein Content – Part 2: Block Digestion/Steam Distillation Method. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (2008). ISO 13906: 2008, Animal feeding stuffs – Determination of Acid Detergent Fibre (ADF) and Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL) Contents. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.Google Scholar
Kalu, B. A. & Fick, G. W. (1981). Quantifying morphological development of alfalfa for studies of herbage quality. Crop Science 21, 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalu, B. A. & Fick, G. W. (1983). Morphological stage of development as a predictor of alfalfa herbage quality. Crop Science 23, 1167–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, K. H. & Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28, 7–55.Google Scholar
Menke, K. H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D. & Schneider, W. (1979). The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, S. C. & Fick, G. W. (1989). Converting alfalfa development measurements from mean stage by count to mean stage by weight. Crop Science 29, 821–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, D., Cherney, J. H. & Peterson, P. R. (2009). Preharvest neutral detergent fiber concentration of alfalfa as influenced by stubble height. Agronomy Journal 101, 769–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. A. (1992). Predictors of alfalfa forage quality: validation with field data. Crop Science 32, 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. A. & Wedin, W. F. (1988). Cell wall composition of alfalfa stems at similar morphological stages and chronological age during spring growth and summer regrowth. Crop Science 28, 342–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statsoft, Inc (2003). Statistica for Windows, release 6·0. Tulsa, OK, USA: Statsoft, Inc.Google Scholar
Sulc, R. M., Albrecht, K. A., Cherney, J. H., Hall, M. H., Mueller, S. C. & Orloff, S. B. (1997). Field testing a rapid method for estimating alfalfa quality. Agronomy Journal 89, 952–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed