Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:41:08.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finishing cattle on sorghum grain and sorghum silage. Effect of hormone implantation and urea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. G. Morris  and
M. S. O'Bryan
J. G. Morris
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly, Queensland, Australia
M. S. O'Bryan
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly, Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The suitability of three ratios of sorghum grain to sorghum silage (40:60, 60:40, and 80:20) with and without a supplement of 60 g. urea per head per day for the finishing of cattle in yards was examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , June 1965 , pp. 343 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

A.O.A.C. (1955). Official Methods of Analysis, 8th edition. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington.Google Scholar
Beames, R. M. (1959). Qd. J. Agric. Sci. 16, 223.Google Scholar
Beames, R. M. & O'Bryan, M. S. (1962). Qd. J. Agric. Sci. 19, 485.Google Scholar
Brethotur, J. R. & Duitsman, W. W. (1961). Circ. Kans. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 382, p. 7.Google Scholar
Clark, R. & Quin, J. I. (1951). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 25 (1), 93.Google Scholar
Coombe, J. B. & Tribe, D. E. (1963). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, M. C., Briggs, P. K. & McClymont, G. L. (1955). J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 21, 216.Google Scholar
Hankins, O. G. & Howe, P. E. (1946). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 926.Google Scholar
Keith, T. B., Johnson, R. F. & Lehrer, W. P. (1952). Bull. Idaho Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 290.Google Scholar
Keith, T. B., Johnson, R. F. & Lehrer, W. P. (1954). Res. Bull. Idaho Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 26.Google Scholar
Keith, T. B., Johnson, R. F. & Lehrer, W. P. (1955). Res. Bull. Idaho Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 32.Google Scholar
Mccroskey, J., Pope, L. S., Walters, L. & Urban, K. (1958). Misc. Publ. Okla. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. MP-51, p. 116.Google Scholar
Moore, L. A., Thomas, T. W. & Sykes, J. F. (1960). Proc. 8th Int. Orassl. Congr., Reading, p. 701.Google Scholar
Morris, J. G. (1958a). Qd. J. Agric. Sci. 15, 161.Google Scholar
Morris, J. G. (1958b). Qd. J. Agric. Sci. 15, 181.Google Scholar
Morris, J. G. & Levitt, M. S. (1964). Aust. J. Sci. 27, 116.Google Scholar
National Research Council, U.S.A. (1958). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington.Google Scholar
Pope, L. S., Humphrey, R. D., Walters, L. & Waller, G. (1957). Misc. Publ. Okla. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. MP-48, p. 64.Google Scholar
Pryor, W. J. & Hart, B. (1961). Aust. Vet. J. 37, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D., Smith, E. F. & Cox, R. F. (1956). Circ. Kerns. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 335, p. 32.Google Scholar
Richardson, D., Smith, E. F., Baker, F. H. & Cox, R. F. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 316.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. W. (1961). Qd. J. Agric. Sci. 18, 409.Google Scholar
Snapp, R. R. & Neumann, A. L. (1960). Beef Cattle, 5th edition, p. 261. London: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Watson, S. J. & Ferguson, W. S. (1937). J. Agric. Sci. 27, 1.Google Scholar
Whiting, F. (1957). Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 37, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N. M., Pearce, G. R., Delaney, M. & Tribe, D. E. (1959). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 27, 107.Google Scholar