Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:15:38.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Control of Chocolate Spot (Botrytis Fabae) Infection of Field Beans (Vicia Faba L.) by the Fungicides Benlate, Bavistin, Cercobin and BAS352F

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Jennifer E. M. Elliott  and
W. J. Whittington
Jennifer E. M. Elliott
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
W. J. Whittington
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a field trial performed within a winter-bean crop (cv. Throws MS) during 1975, Benlate, Bavistin, Cercobin and BAS352F were shown to effect some control over a mild, non-aggressive chocolate spot attack after one foliar application. Following a second foliar application, disease incidence on the leaves was significantly reduced by all except the Cercobin treatment, and reductions in the incidence of aggressive lesions on the leaves and the degree of infection on the pods were effected by all except the BAS352F treatment, indicating this chemical to be non-systemic. A reduced rate of leaf loss was observed for plants treated with Benlate, Bavistin or Cercobin, suggesting that part of the disease control effected by these chemicals might indirectly result from a delay of leaf senescence.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 461 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Development And Advisory Service (1974). Control of chocolate spot. Experiments and Developments in the Eastern Region, pp. 154–156.Google Scholar
Basf United Kingdom Limited (1975). Data sheet for BAS352F. Agrochemical Division, U.K.Google Scholar
Bollen, G. J. (1972). A comparison of the in vitro antifungal spectra of thiophanates and benomyl. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 78, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemons, G. P. & Sisler, H. D. (1969). Formation of a fungitoxio derivative from Benlate. Phytopathology 59, 705–706.Google Scholar
Delp, C. J. & Klopping, H. L. (1968). Performance attributes of a new fungicide and mite ovicide candidate. Plant Disease Reporter 52, 95–99.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. E. M. & Whittington, W. J. (1978). The effect of soil pH on the severity of chocolate spot infection on field bean varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 563–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, M. H. R. (1958). Field beans. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Publication, London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Vonk, J. W. & Sijpesteijn, A. K. (1971). Methyl benzimidazol-2-yl carbamate, the fungitoxic principle of Thiophanate-methyl. Pesticide Science 2, 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. F. (1975). Cytokinin activity of benomyl. Australian Plant Pathology Society Newsletter 4 (2), 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar