Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:16:39.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the effect of straw incorporation and CO2 enrichment on the growth, nitrogen fixation and yield of soya beans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. Shivashankar ,
K. Vlassak  and
J. Livens
K. Shivashankar
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Soil Fertility and Soil Biology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3030–Heverlee, Belgium
K. Vlassak
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Soil Fertility and Soil Biology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3030–Heverlee, Belgium
J. Livens
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Soil Fertility and Soil Biology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3030–Heverlee, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a glasshouse pot culture experiment, the effect of adding straw at 3 and 6 t/ha with and without CO2 enrichment treatments at 1000 mg/1 from flowering to the pod-filling stage in open top chambers was evaluated on the growth and yield of soya beans in relation to nitrogen fixation. N2-ase activity of the soya-bean root nodules as determined by the acetylene reduction technique indicated that (1) straw on average gave significantly 34 and 43% higher N2-ase activity at 3 and 6 t/ha respectively than the controls; (2) CO2 treatments on average increased the activity by 34% compared with the no CO2 treatments; and (3) the mean N2-ase activity nearly doubled from 9·7 μg/h/plant in the control to 18·7 and 19·7 μg/h/plant with straw incorporation in conjunction with CO2 enrichment. High correlations were observed between weight of nodules and dry weight of leaves, between dry weight of nodules and grain yield and between dry weight of leaves and grain yield. Incorporation of straw was found to be beneficial in increasing CO2 content of soil air and in improving the growth and development of the plants. This study lends support to a hypothesis that straw can be considered to provide a partial substitute for the expensive CO2 enrichment treatment for improving N2(C2H2) fixation capacity and thereby the general growth and yield of crops.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , August 1976 , pp. 181 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bruinsma, J. (1963). The quantitative analysis of chlorophylls a and b in plant extracts. Photochemistry and Photobiology (Chlor. Metabol. Sym.) 2, 241–9. Great Britain: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Brun, W. A. & Cooper, R. L. (1967). Effects of light intensity and carbon dioxide concentration on photosynthetic rate of soybean. Crop Science 7, 451–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. L. & Brun, W. A. (1967). Response of soybeans to a carbon dioxide-enriched atmosphere. Crop Science 7, 455–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englehorn, A. J., Lawton, K., Meldrum, H. R. & Norman, A. G. (1947). Effect of straw and cornstalks on the yield of soybeans. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 39, 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, R. W. F. & Havelka, U. D. (1973). Symbiotic N2 fixation: Multifold enhancement by CO4 enrichment of field grown soybeans. Plant Physiology 48 (Supplement), p. 35.Google Scholar
Hardy, R. W. F. & Havelka, U. D. (1974). The nitrogen barrier. Crops and Soils 26 (5), 10–3.Google Scholar
Hardy, R. W. F., Holsten, R. D., Jackson, E. K. & Burns, R. C. (1968). The acetylene-ethylene assay for N2 fixation: Laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiology 43, 1185–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livens, J. & Verstraeten, L. (1971). Verslag van de onderzoekingen uitgevoerd gedurende de periode 1 juli 1969–30 April 1971. Report of the Komitee voor de Studie van de Scheikundige Vruchtbaarheid van de Bodem. Afdeling-Leuven I.W.O.N.L.Google Scholar
Mishustin, E. N. & Erofeev, N. S. (1965). Elimination of a nitrogen deficit in the soil using straw as organic fertilizer. Mikrobiologiya 34, 1056–62.Google Scholar
Mishustin, E. N. & Shil'nikova, V. K. (1971). Biological Fixation of Atmospheric Nitrogen. Bath: Macmillan, Pitman Press.Google Scholar
Norman, A. G. & Krampitz, L. O. (1946). The nitrogen nutrition of soybeans. II. Effect of available soil nitrogen on growth and nitrogen fixation. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 10, 191–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinck, L. A., Allison, F. E. & Gaddy, V. L. (1946). The effect of straw and nitrogen on the yield and quantity of nitrogen fixed by soybeans. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 38, 421–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shivashankar, K., Vlassak, K. & Livens, J. (1975). Influence d'une application de paille et de molybdène sur la croissance et le rendement d'une culture de soja. Revue de l'Agriculture 3, 675–81.Google Scholar
Thornton, H. G. (1929). The effeot of fresh straw on the growth of certain legumes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 19, 563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. W. (1940). The Biochemistry of Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation, pp. 302. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J. L. & Lemon, E. (1970). The exchange of carbon dioxide between the atmosphere and the plant. Transactions of the ASAE, pp. 238–9.Google Scholar