Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:26:37.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water relations of winter wheat: 4. Hydraulic resistance and capacitance in the soil-plant system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. S. Wallace  and
P. V. Biscoe
J. S. Wallace
Affiliation:
Nottingham University School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire
P. V. Biscoe
Affiliation:
Nottingham University School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A simple model is presented which can account for the hysteresis observed in the relationship between leaf water potential (χ1) and water flow per stem (Q) in winter wheat. Using this model the total hydraulic resistance (R) and capacitance (C) of the soil-plant system were estimated from measured diurnal changes in χ1 and Q. Daily mean values of R were constant when the soil water potential (χ1) was above – 0·6 MPa, but R increased by about 40% when the soil dried to – 1·5 MPa. R also appeared to vary during the day, increasing in the afternoon and evening.

The results of experiments on the recovery of χ1 in plants from which transpiration was prevented suggested that the major resistance to flow was in the soil-root system and that it was an increase in this resistance which gave rise to the overall increase in R as the soil dried.

There was substantial variation in the estimates of hydraulic capacitance (C) and no systematic diurnal or seasonal trend was evident. Despite the variation in C the mean value for the season, 8 x 10-7 m3/MPa, predicted realistic changes in plant water storage. Estimates of the components of C indicated that the major capacitance was located in the soil-root complex. More information is needed about the components of R and C, particularly those in the soil-root system.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , June 1983 , pp. 591 - 600
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrs, H. D. (1973). Controlled environment studies of the effect of variable atmospheric water stress on photosynthesis, transpiration and water status of Zea mays and other species. In Plant Responses to Climatic Factors. Proceedings Uppsala Symposium 1973 (ed. Slatyer, R. O.). Paris: U.N.E.S.C.O.Google Scholar
Begg, J. E. & Turner, N. C. (1970). Water potential gradients in field tobacco. Plant Physiology 46, 343–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, A. (1969). Transpiration, potential hydrique et résistance a la circulation de l'eau dans une culture d'Helianthus annuus L. Oecologia Plantarum 4, 123–154.Google Scholar
Biscoe, P. V., Clark, J. A., Gregson, K., McGowan, M., Monteith, J. L. & Scott, R. K. (1975). Barley and its environment. I. Theory and practice. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 227–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biscoe, P. V., Cohen, Y. & Wallace, J. S. (1976). Daily and seasonal changes in water potential in cereals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 273, 565–580.Google Scholar
Biscoe, P. V. & Saffell, R. A. (1976). A computer controlled data logger for investigating the environmental control of the growth of winter wheat. In 4th ARC Data Logging Symposium (ed. Marsh, L.), pp. 1–9. Silsoe, Bedfordshire: National Institute of Agricultural Engineering.Google Scholar
Boyer, J. S. (1968). Relationship of water potential to growth of leaves. Plant Physiology 43, 1056–1062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, J. S. (1969). Free-energy transfer in plants. Science 163, 1219–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, J. S. (1971). Resistances to water transport in soybean, bean and sunflower. Crop Science 11, 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, I. R. (1965). Transport of water in the soilplant-atmosphere system. Journal of Applied Ecology 2, 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, E. F. (1966). Resistance to water flow through the plant. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Denmead, O. T. & Millar, B. D. (1976). Water transport in wheat plants in the field. Agronomy Journal 68, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubé, P. A., Stevenson, K. R., Thurtell, G. W. & Neumann, H. H. (1975). Steady state resistance to water flow in corn under well watered conditions. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55, 941–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Water relations of winter wheat. 2. Soil water relations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1978). Water relations in winter wheat. 1. Growth of the root system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, G. K. (1974). Resistance to water transport in soil and young wheat plants. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 24, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, G. K. (1975). A dynamic simulation model of water flow in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 25, 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellkvist, J., Richards, G. P. & Jarvis, P. G. (1974). Vertical gradients of water potential and tissue water relations in Sitka spruce trees measured with a pressure chamber. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 637–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janes, B. E. (1970). Effect of carbon dioxide, osmotic potential of nutrient solution, and light intensity on transpiration and resistance to flow of water in pepper plants. Plant Physiology 45, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvis, P. G. (1975). Water transfer in plants. In Heat and Mass Transfer in the Biosphere. I. Transfer Processes in Plant Environment (ed. Vries, D. A. de and Afgan, N. H.), pp. 369–394. Washington: Scripta Book Co.Google Scholar
Jarvis, P. G. (1976). The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 273, 593–610.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. D., Taylor, S. A. & Wiebe, H. H. (1961). Negative transport and resistance to water flow through plants. Plant Physiology 36, 633–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, H. G. (1978). Modelling diurnal trends of leaf water potential in transpiring wheat. Journal of Applied Ecology 15, 613–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, P. J. (1938). Root resistance as a cause of adsorption lag. American Journal of Botany 25, 110–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, P. J. (1969). Plant and Soil Water Relationships: a Modern Synthesis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Landsberg, J. J., Beadle, C. L., Biscoe, P. V., Butler, D. R., Davidson, B., Incoll, L. D., James, G. B., Jarvis, P. G., Martin, P. J., Neilson, R. E., Powell, D. B. B., Slack, E. M., Thorpe, M. R., Turner, N. C., Warritt, B. & Watts, W. R. (1975). Diurnal energy, water and CO2 exchanges in an apple (Malus pumila) orchard. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 659–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, H. H., Thurtell, G. W. & Stevenson, K. R. (1974). In situ measurements of leaf water potential and resistance to water flow. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 54, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, E. I. (1969 a). Resistance to water flow in soil and plant. I. Soil resistance in relation to amounts of root: theoretical estimates. Journal of Applied Ecology 6, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, E. I. (1969 b). Resistance to water flow in soil and plant. II. A review of experimental evidence on the rhizosphere resistance. Journal of Applied Ecology 6, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning de Vries, F. W. T. (1972). A model for simulating transpiration of leaves with special attention to stomatal functioning. Journal of Applied Ecology 9, 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, D. B. B. & Thorpe, M. R. (1977). Dynamic aspects of plant-water relations. In Environmental Effects on Crop Physiology (ed. Landsberg, J. J. and Cutting, C. V.), pp. 259–279. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1977). The use of tree cutting techniques in the study of the water relations of mature Pinus sylvestris L. Journal of Experimental Botany 28, 751–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, J. H. & Lemon, E. R. (1968). Photosynthesis under field conditions. XI. Soil-plant-water relations during drought stress in corn. Agronomy Journal 60, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterne, R. E., Kaufmann, M. R. & Zentmyer, G. A. (1977). Environmental effects of transpiration and leaf water potential in avocado. Physiologia Plantarum 41, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, R. & Weatherley, P. E. (1971). The influence of root system in the relationship between the rate of transpiration and depression of leaf water potential. New Phytologist 70, 547–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinklin, R. & Weatherley, P. E. (1966). On the relationship between transpiration rate and leaf water potential. New Phytologist 65, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Honert, T. H. (1948). Water transport in plants as a catenary process. Discussions of the Faraday Society 3, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J. S. (1978). Water transport and leaf water relations in winter wheat crops. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. S., Clark, J. A. & McGowan, M. (1983). Water relations of winter wheat. 3. Components of leaf water potential and the soil-plant water potential gradient. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 581–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, D. (1975). The effects of water stress on the photosynthesis and growth of plants. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar