Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:56:47.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in grain size and shape in a population of hull-less barley and its influence on yield and quality traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2016

J. S. SWANSTON ,
W. T. B. THOMAS ,
R. P. KEITH  and
J. E. MIDDLEFELL-WILLIAMS
J. S. SWANSTON
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
W. T. B. THOMAS
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
R. P. KEITH
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
J. E. MIDDLEFELL-WILLIAMS*
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Thirty-seven lines from a population derived from the hull-less barley cultivar, Penthouse, were grown in a replicated trial over three seasons and assessed for grain yield. Following harvest, a rapid test to measure grain dimensions was applied to all samples, to look for novel variation in grain size and shape, as a possible way of detecting mutations. A range of grain and malt quality traits was also measured in two of the seasons, to detect genotype × season interactions and determine relationships between the measured traits. There were significant differences between years for all traits and between genotypes for most. Genotype × season interaction was significant for grain dimensions and some malting traits, but a correlation between malting quality and grain dimensions was only observed in one season. Line 30 showed very high yield potential in a comparatively wet season and gave a higher alcohol yield per unit area than a hulled control variety, while lines 21 and 33 contained putative additional mutations. Line 21, previously observed to have higher enzyme activity, appeared to contain an additional dwarfing gene and was characterized by smaller grain, later ear emergence and lower yield. Line 33, with malting potential, showed considerably altered grain length to width ratio and will be further investigated as a possible globosum type.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 155 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 117 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aastrup, S. & Munck, L. (1981). Genetic and plant breeding studies of barley using new analyses for 1,3:1,4 beta-glucan and cell wall breakdown during malting. In Barley Genetics IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Barley Genetics Symposium (Eds Asher, M. J. C., Ellis, R. P., Hayter, A. M. & Whitehouse, R. N. H.), pp. 186–195. Edinburgh, UK: The University Press.Google Scholar
Agu, R. C., Devenny, D. L., Tillett, I. J. L. & Palmer, G. H. (2002). Malting performance of normal, huskless and acid-dehusked barley samples. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 108, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agu, R. C., Bringhurst, T. A. & Brosnan, J. M. (2008). Performance of husked, acid dehusked and hull-less barley and malt in relation to alcohol production. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 114, 62–68.Google Scholar
Agu, R. C., Bringhurst, T. A., Brosnan, J. M. & Pearson, S. (2009). Potential of hull-less barley malt for use in malt and grain whisky production. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 115, 128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, M. J., Ellis, R. P., Hayter, A. M. & Swanston, J. S. (1979). Breeding for malting quality at the Scottish Plant Breeding Station. Scottish Plant Breeding Station Annual Report 58, 92–139.Google Scholar
Baik, B-K., Newman, C. W. & Newman, R. K. (2011). Food uses of barley. In Barley: Production, Improvement and Uses (Ed. Ullrich, S. E.), pp. 532–562. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bhatty, R. S. (1986). The potential of hull-less barley – a review. Cereal Chemistry 63, 97–103.Google Scholar
Bhatty, R. S. (1999). The potential of hull-less barley. Cereal Chemistry 76, 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatty, R. S., Christison, G. I. & Rossnagel, B. G. (1979). Energy and protein digestibilities of hulled and hulless barley determined by swine-feeding. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59, 585–588.Google Scholar
Box, A. J. & Eglinton, J. K. (2010). Barley breeding and its potential impact on human health and nutrition. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Barley Genetics Symposium (Eds Ceccarelli, S. & Grando, S.), pp. 589–602. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
Bringhurst, T. A., Brosnan, J. M., McInnes, B. & Steele, G. M. (1996). Methods for determining the fermentability and predicted spirit yield of distilling malts. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 102, 433–437.Google Scholar
Edney, M. J. & Langrell, D. E. (2004). Evaluating the malting quality of hulless CDC Dawn, acid-dehusked Harrington and Harrington barley. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists 62, 18–22.Google Scholar
Edney, M. J. & Rossnagel, B. G. (2000). Producing a quality malt from hulless barley. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Barley Genetics Symposium, Volume 1, Invited Papers (Ed. Logue, S.), pp. 91–93. Adelaide, Australia: University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. P., Powell, W., Swanston, J. S. & Thomas, C. E. (1986). Genetical analysis of a barley mutant with reduced height and increased diastatic power. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 619–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franckowiak, J. (1997). Description of BGS 168. Barley Genetics Newsletter 26, 194.Google Scholar
Grime, C. R., Tarr, A. & Boyd, W. J. R. (2007). Evaluation of globosum barley for pearling and plump grain. In Extracting Profit from Quality Research: Proceeding of the 13th Australian Barley Technical Symposium. Available from: http://www.proceedings.com.au/abts2007/pdf/13_ABTS-07_Grime.pdf (verified 4 November 2015).Google Scholar
Hicks, K. B., Montanti, J. & Nghiem, N. P. (2014). Use of barley grain and straw for biofuels and other industrial uses. In Barley Chemistry and Technology, 2nd edn (Eds Shewry, P. R. & Ullrich, S. E.), pp. 269–291. St Paul: AACC International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingledew, W. M., Jones, A. M., Bhatty, R. S. & Rossnagel, B. G. (1995). Fuel alcohol production from hull-less barley. Cereal Chemistry 72, 147–150.Google Scholar
Kikuchi, S., Taketa, S., Ichii, M. & Kawasaki, S. (2003). Efficient fine mapping of the naked caryopsis gene (nud) by HEGS (high efficiency genome scanning)/AFLP in barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108, 73–78.Google Scholar
Newman, R. K., Newman, C. W. & Graham, H. (1989). The hypocholesterolemic function of barley β-glucans. Cereal Foods World 34, 883–886.Google Scholar
Nghiem, N. P., Hicks, K. B., Johnston, D. B., Senske, G., Kurantz, M., Li, M., Shetty, J. & Konieczny- Janda, G. (2010). Production of ethanol from winter barley by the EDGE (enhanced dry grind enzymatic) process. Biotechnology for Biofuels 3, 8. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-8 Google Scholar
Palmer, G. H. (1989). Cereals in malting and brewing. In Cereal Science and Technology (Ed. Palmer, G. H.), pp. 61–242. Aberdeen, UK: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Muurinen, S., Vilppu, M., Rajala, A., Gates, F. & Kirkkari, A. M. (2001). Germination and grain vigour of naked oat in response to grain moisture at harvest. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 137, 147–156.Google Scholar
Rendell, M., Vanderhoof, J., Venn, M., Shehas, M. A., Arndt, E., Rao, C. S., Gill, G., Newman, R. K. & Newman, C. W. (2005). Effect of a barley breakfast cereal on blood glucose and insulin response in normal and diabetic patients. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 60, 63–67.Google Scholar
Sole, S. (2003). The naked truth. Brewers’ Guardian, August, 19–22.Google Scholar
Swanston, J. S. (2014). The barley husk: a potential barrier to future success? In Barley: Physical Properties, Genetic Factors and Environmental Impacts on Growth (Ed. Hasanuma, K.), pp. 81–106. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Swanston, J. S. & Thomas, W. T. B. (1996). Breeding barley for malt whisky distilling. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Oat Conference and the Seventh International Barley Genetics Symposium, Vol 1, (Eds Slinkard, A., Scoles, G. & Rossnagel, B.), pp. 38–40. Saskatoon, Canada: University Extension Press.Google Scholar
Swanston, J. S., Sopena, A., Moralejo, M. A. & Molina-Cano, J.-L. (2002). Germination and malting properties of mutants derived from malting barley cv. Triumph. Cereal Chemistry 79, 392–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanston, J. S., Middlefell-Williams, J. E., Forster, B. P. & Thomas, W. T. B. (2011). Effects of grain and malt β-glucan on distilling quality in a population of hull-less barley. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 117, 389–393.Google Scholar
Swanston, J. S. & Middlefell-Williams, J. E. (2012 a). The influence of steep regime and germination period on the malting properties of some hull-less barley lines. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 118, 186–191.Google Scholar
Swanston, J. S. & Middlefell-Williams, J. E. (2012 b). Screening hull-less barley mutants for potential use in grain whisky distilling. In Advances in Barley Sciences, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Barley Genetics Symposium (Eds Zhang, G., Li, C. & Liu, X.), pp. 159–168. Zhejiang, China: University Press.Google Scholar
Swanston, J. S., Smith, P. L., Thomas, W. T. B., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Kindred, D. R., Brosnan, J. M., Bringhurst, T. A. & Agu, R. C. (2014). Stability, across environments, of grain and alcohol yield, in soft wheat varieties grown for grain distilling or bioethanol production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94, 3234–3240.Google Scholar
Taketa, S., Kikuchi, S., Awayama, T., Yamamoto, S., Ichii, M. & Kawasaki, S. (2004). Monophyletic origin of naked barley inferred from molecular analyses of a marker closely linked to the naked caryopsis gene (nud). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108, 1236–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taketa, S., Amano, S., Tsujino, Y., Sato, T., Saisho, D., Kakeda, K., Nomura, M., Suzuki, T., Matsumoto, T., Sato, K., Kanamori, H., Kawasaki, S. & Takeda, K. (2008). Barley grain with adhering hulls is controlled by an ERF family transcription factor gene regulating a lipid biosynthesis pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 105, 4062–4067.Google Scholar
Tashi, N. (2005). Food preparation from hull-less barley in Tibet. In Food Barley: Importance, Uses and Local Knowledge (Eds Grando, S. & Gomez Macpherson, H.), pp. 115–120. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. C., Dhas, A., Rossnagel, B. G. & Ingledew, W. M. (1995). Production of fuel alcohol from hull-less barley by very high gravity technology. Cereal Chemistry 72, 360–364.Google Scholar
Thornton, M. S. (1986). Investigations into the problems associated with the development of naked oats as a crop. PhD Thesis, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
VSN International (2012). Genstat 15th Edition Upgrade. Hemel Hempsted, UK: VSN International. Available from: http://www.vsni.co.uk/downloads/genstat/15th-edition-upgrade (verified 26 November 2015).Google Scholar
Xu, T. W. (1982). Origin and evolution of cultivated barley in China. Acta Genetica Sinica 9, 440–446.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.Google Scholar
Zohary, D. & Hopf, M. (1988). Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The Origin and Spread of Cultivated Plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar