Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:44:50.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protein and mineral metabolism in pregnant sows on a normal or high calcium diet compared with a calcium-deficient diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. E. Evans
R. E. Evans
Affiliation:
(Animal Nutrition Institute, School of Agriculture, Cambridge.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

(1) The physiological effects of calcium-deficiency on pregnant sows are briefly discussed. Results are given which demonstrate that a deficiency of lime in the food has no detrimental effect on the live weight of the young piglings at birth thus showing that up to parturition it is the mother organism that suffers and not the offspring.

(2) Storage of nitrogen takes place throughout pregnancy but the results indicate a considerably enhanced conservation within three weeks of parturition. The average daily retention of nitrogen by the high-calcium group of sows was 12·51 gm. and by the calcium-deficient group 9·78 gm. The normal sows therefore stored 1439 gm. N and the calcium-deficient 1125 gm. N during the gestation period. It is shown that storage of protein during pregnancy is greatly in excess of the foetal requirement, so that the mother organism, during gestation, adds on a reserve supply of protein in preparation for parturition and lactation.

(3) Ash ingredients were retained at all stages of gestation by both groups of sows. The addition of calcium carbonate to the food, however, resulted in an increased retention of ash. The percentage of the ash intake in the faeces was very similar in both groups, but the percentage of the intake in the urine was distinctly higher in the calcium-deficient sows indicating a more economical utilisation of ash by this group.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , October 1929 , pp. 752 - 798
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Hagemann., Arch. f. Anat. u. Phys. (1890).Google Scholar
(2) Ver Eeke, . Mém. de l'Acad. Roy. de Bdgique (1901).Google Scholar
(3) Jägerroos., Arch. f. Gynäk. (1903), 67.Google Scholar
(4) Bar, and Daunay., J. de Physiol. et de Path. (1905), 7.Google Scholar
(5) Murlin, . Amer. J. Physiol. (1910), 27, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Michel, . Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. (1899), 51.Google Scholar
(7) Hoffstrom, . Skandinavisches Arch, für Physiol. (1910), 23, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Landsberg, . Z. f. Geburtsh. u. Gynaekol (1912), 71.Google Scholar
(9) Wilson., Bull, of the Johns Hopkins Hospital (1916), 27, No. 303.Google Scholar
(10) Crowther, and Woodman, . J. Agric. Sci. (1922), 12, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Harding, V. J. Physiol. Rev. (1925), 5, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12) Dibbelt., Quoted from Ohio. Tech. Bull. No. 5, Forbes and Keith (1910).Google Scholar
(13) Schkarim, . Quoted from Ohio. Tech. Bull. No. 5, Forbes and Keith (1910).Google Scholar
(14) Hart, Steenbock and Fuller., Research Bull. No. 30, Madison Agric. Stn. (1914), p. 13.Google Scholar
(15) Orr, . Trans, of the Highland and Agric. Soc. of Scotland (1923), 35.Google Scholar
(16) Wilson, . Amer. J. Physiol. (1903), 8, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17) Hart, and McCollum, . Wisconsin Expt. Stn. Research Bull. No. 5.Google Scholar
(18) Forbes, . Bull. No. 330, Ohio Agric. Expt. Stn. (1918), p. 111 (3rd paper).Google Scholar
(19) Theiler, Green and Du Toit, . J. Agric. Sci. (1927), 17, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20) Griswold, and others. Missouri Expt. Stn. Research Bull. No. 114, (1928), 58.Google Scholar