Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:30:19.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The isoleucine requirement of the weanling pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. E. Evans
R. E. Evans
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The current standards or estimates of the essential amino acid requirements of swine are based almost wholly on growth trials. These were carried out with groups of three or four pigs fed individually on semisynthetic diets. The trials generally lasted for only 30–35 days since several expensive amino acids were being fed. The main criticism is that the values given were not adequately substantiated by carrying out nitrogen-balance determinations. It is also possible that the nitrogen-retention values might have led to different conclusions from those arrived at on the basis of the growth trials only. The standards must remain tentative until tested with a larger number of animals and until many more nitrogenbalance determinations have been carried out.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , June 1962 , pp. 413 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albanese, A. A. (1945). J. Biol. Chem. 157, 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, D. E., Jensen, A. H., Terrill, S. W., Smith, I. D. & Norton, H. W. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellis, D. B. (1961). J. Anim. Prod. 3, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinegar, M. J., Loosli, J. K., Maynard, L. A. & Williams, H. H. (1950). J. Nutr. 42, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dammers, J. (1955). Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 80, 361.Google Scholar
Deshpande, P. D., Harper, A. E., Collins, M. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1957). Arch. Biochem. Biophya. 67, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 53, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1960). J. Agric. Sci. 54, 267.Google Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 57, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 58, 7.Google Scholar
Geiger, E., Courtney, G. W. & Geiger, L. E. (1952). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 41, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, J. P., Levintow, L., Barker, C. G. & White, J. (1951). J. Biol. Chem. 188, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Man, Th. J. & Zwiep, N. (1955). Voeding, 16, 147.Google Scholar
National Research Council U.S.A. (publ. 648) (1959). Nutrient Requirements for Swine.Google Scholar
Rose, W. C. (1938). Phys. Rev. 18, 109.Google Scholar
Sauberlich, H. E., Chang, Wan-Yuin & Salman, W. D (1953). J. Nutr. 51, 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar