Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:05:17.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of dietary neutral detergent fibre to protein ratio on duodenal microbial nitrogen flow and nitrogen losses in lactating cows fed high-concentrate total mixed rations with different forage combinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2015

Q. C. REN ,
X. JIN ,
Z. H. ZHANG ,
H. J. YANG  and
S. L. LI
Q. C. REN
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China College of Animal Science, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, People's Republic of China
X. JIN
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
Z. H. ZHANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
H. J. YANG*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
S. L. LI*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected] and [email protected]
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected] and [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of dietary neutral detergent fibre (NDF) : crude protein (CP) ratio on duodenal microbial crude protein (MCP) flow and nitrogen (N) losses. The study was completed in a 5 × 5 Latin square design with five lactating Holstein dairy cows and 5 high-concentrate total mixed rations (TMR) with different forage combinations, typical for Northern China. The rations with a fixed forage-to-concentrate ratio (39 : 61) resulted in different dietary NDF : CP ratios: TMR1 3·03 : 1 (428·2 g NDF/kg : 141·4 g CP/kg); TMR2 2·74 : 1 (392·7 g NDF/kg : 143·2 g CP/kg); TMR3 2·55 : 1 (368·3 g NDF/kg : 144·4 g CP/kg); TMR4 1·84 : 1 (304·8 g NDF/kg : 165·8 g CP/kg); TMR5 1·60 : 1 (285·0 g NDF/kg : 178·0 g CP/kg). Rumen content, milk, blood, urine and faeces were sampled on the last 3 days of five 18-day periods. Purine derivatives in the urine samples were determined to estimate rumen MCP flow into the small intestine. Milk yield and milk protein yield increased linearly with decreasing dietary NDF : CP ratio although slight differences in dry matter intake were observed due to feed intake restriction. Diurnal ammonia N in the rumen and duodenal MCP flow increased linearly, but blood urea N, urinary N and faecal N linearly decreased with decreasing dietary NDF : CP ratio. The enhanced N utilization in the maize-silage-based TMRs (TMR4–5) in comparison with maize-stover-based TMRs (TMR1–3) increased milk yield and the synthesis of milk protein instead of milk fat in the lactating cows, probably due to high transfer of ammonia N into rumen MCP with a considerable increase of dietary non-fibre carbohydrate content and the decrease of NDF : CP ratio. The present results indicate that not only increasing dietary non-structural carbohydrate content but also adjusting the ratio of structural carbohydrate to CP ratio are important diet formulation strategies for mitigating N losses in lactating cows.

Type
Animal Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 153 , Issue 4 , May 2015 , pp. 753 - 764
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, M. S. (2000). Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 1598–1624.Google Scholar
Allen, M. S. & Mertens, D. R. (1988). Effect of dietary fiber level and forage source on intake and milk production of Holstein cows (abstract). Journal of Dairy Science 71(Suppl. 1), 179.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. M., Muller, L. D., Varga, G. A. & Griel, L. C. (1993). Non-structural carbohydrate and protein effects on rumen fermentation, nutrient flow, and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1091–1105.Google Scholar
AOAC (1999). Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edn.Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC International.Google Scholar
Cabrita, A. R. J., Bessa, R. J. B., Alves, S. P., Dewhurst, R. J. & Fonseca, A. J. M. (2007). Effects of dietary protein and starch on intake, milk production, and milk fatty acid profiles of dairy cows fed corn silage-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1429–1439.Google Scholar
Cao, Z. J., Ma, M., Yan, X. Y., Li, S. L. & Zhang, X. M. (2009). A simple urine-collecting apparatus and method for cows and heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5224–5228.Google Scholar
Chen, X. B., Chen, Y. K., Franklin, M. F., Ørskov, E. R. & Shand, W. J. (1992). The effect of feed intake and body weight on purine derivative excretion and microbial protein supply in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1534–1542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewhurst, R. J., Davies, D. R. & Merry, R. J. (2000). Microbial protein supply from the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 85, 1–21.Google Scholar
Firkins, J. L. (1997). Effects of feeding nonforage fiber sources on site of fiber digestion. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1426–1437.Google Scholar
Grings, E. E., Roffler, R. E. & Deitelhoff, D. P. (1991). Response of dairy cows in early lactation to additions of cottonseed meal in alfalfa-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 2580–2587.Google Scholar
Herrera-Saldana, R., Gomez-Alarcon, R., Torabi, M. & Huber, J. T. (1990). Influence of synchronizing protein and starch degradation in the rumen on nutrient utilization and microbial protein synthesis. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 142–148.Google Scholar
Hoover, W. H. & Stokes, S. R. (1991). Balancing carbohydrate and protein for optimum rumen microbial yield. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3630–3644.Google Scholar
Hristov, A. N. & Broderick, G. A. (1996). Synthesis of microbial protein in ruminally cannulated cows fed alfalfa silage, alfalfa hay, or corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 1627–1637.Google Scholar
Hristov, A. N. & Ropp, J. K. (2003). Effect of dietary carbohydrate composition and availability on utilization of ruminal ammonia nitrogen for milk protein synthesis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2416–2427.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, P. & Shingfield, K. J. (2005). Grass silage: factors affecting efficiency of N utilization in milk production. In Silage Production and Utilization. Proceedings of the XIVth International Silage Conference, Belfast, Northern Ireland, July 2005 (Eds Park, R. S. & Stronge, M. D.), pp. 35–50. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. (1976). Influence of carbohydrate solubility on non-protein nitrogen utilization in the ruminant. Journal of Animal Science 43, 184–191.Google Scholar
Khorasani, G. R., Okine, E. K., Corbett, R. R. & Kennelly, J. J. (2001). Nutritive value of peas for lactating dairy cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81, 541–551.Google Scholar
Koenig, K. M., Beauchemin, K. A. & Rode, L. M. (2003). Effect of grain processing and silage on microbial protein synthesis and nutrient digestibility in beef cattle fed barley-based diets. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1057–1067.Google Scholar
Kuoppala, K., Yrjänen, S., Jaakkola, S., Kangasniemi, R., Sariola, J. & Khalili, H. (2004). Effects of increasing concentrate energy supply on the performance of loose-housed dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets. Livestock Production Science 85, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, R. A. & Nolan, J. V. (1984). Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 1072–1089.Google Scholar
Linn, J. G. & Olson, J. D. (1995). Using milk urea nitrogen to evaluate diets and reproductive performance of dairy cattle. In Proceedings of the 4-State Applied Nutrient Management Conference, August 2-3 1995, La Crosse, WI, pp. 155–167. Madison, WI, USA: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Martin, O. & Sauvant, D. (2002). Meta-analysis of input/output kinetics in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 3363–3381.Google Scholar
Maynard, L. A., Loosli, J. K., Hintz, H. F. & Warner, R. G. (1979). Animal Nutrition. 7th edn.New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Meng, Q., Kerley, M. S., Ludden, P. A. & Belyea, R. L. (1999). Fermentation substrate and dilution rate interact to affect microbial growth and efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 77, 206–214.Google Scholar
Moorby, J. M., Dewhurst, R. J., Evans, R. T. & Danelón, J. L. (2006). Effects of dairy cow diet forage proportion on duodenal nutrient supply and urinary purine derivative excretion. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3552–3562.Google Scholar
Nocek, J. E. & Russell, J. B. (1988). Protein and energy as an integrated system: relationship of ruminal protein and carbohydrate availability to microbial synthesis and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 2070–2107.Google Scholar
NRC (2001). Nutrition Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Rinne, M., Jaakkola, S., Kaustell, K., Heikkila, T. & Huhtanen, P. (1999). Silages harvested at different stages of grass growth v. concentrate foods as energy and protein sources in milk production. Animal Science 69, 251–263.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. A., González, J., Alvir, M. R., Repetto, J. L., Centeno, C. & Lamrani, F. (2000). Composition of bacteria harvested from the liquid and solid fractions of the rumen of sheep as influenced by intake level. British Journal of Nutrition 84, 369–376.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, L. A., Stallings, C. C., Herbein, J. H. & McGilliard, M. L. (1997). Diurnal variation in milk and plasma urea nitrogen in Holstein and Jersey cows in response to degradable dietary protein and added fat. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 3368–3376.Google Scholar
Russell, J. B., O'Connor, J. D., Fox, D. G., Van Soest, P. J. & Sniffen, C. J. (1992). A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3551–3561.Google Scholar
Russell, J. B., Sniffen, C. J. & Van Soest, P. J. (1983). Effect of carbohydrate limitation on degradation and utilization of casein by mixed rumen bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 763–775.Google Scholar
SAS (2004). SAS/STAT User's Guide Statistics, Version 9.1. Cary, NC: : SAS Inst., Inc.Google Scholar
Tamminga, S. (1992). Nutrition management of dairy cows as a contribution to pollution control. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 345–357.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F., Moe, P. W. & Flatt, W. P. (1980). Influence of excess protein intake on energy metabolism of the dairy cow. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (Eds Schurch, A. & Wenk, C.), pp. 69–72. EAAP Publication no. 13. Zurich, Switzerland: Juris Verlag.Google Scholar
Tyrell, H. F. & Reid, J. T. (1965). Prediction of energy value of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 1215–1223.Google Scholar
Valadares, R. F. D., Broderick, G. A., Valadares Filho, S. C. & Clayton, M. K. (1999). Effect of replacing alfalfa silage with high moisture corn on ruminal protein synthesis estimated from excretion of total purine derivatives. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2686–2696.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Verbic, J., Chen, X. B., MacLeod, N. A. & Ørskov, E. R. (1990). Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants: effect of microbial nucleic acid infusion on purine derivative excretion by steers. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 114, 243–248.Google Scholar
Verdouw, H., Van Echteld, C. J. A. & Dekkers, E. M. J. (1978). Ammonia determination based on indophenol formation with sodium salicylate. Water Research 12, 339–402.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Liu, J. X., Yuan, Z. P., Wu, Y. M., Zhai, S. W. & Ye, H. W. (2007). Effect of level of metabolizable protein on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 2960–2965.Google Scholar
Wattiaux, M. A. & Armentano, L. E. (2006). Carbohydrate metabolism in dairy cows. In Dairy Essentials (Ed. Wattiaux, M. A.), pp. 9–12. Madison, WI, USA: Babcock Institute for International Dairy Research & Development/University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Wright, T. C., Moscardini, S., Luimes, P. H., Susmel, P. & McBride, B. W. (1998). Effects of rumen-undegradable protein and feed intake on nitrogen balance and milk protein production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 784–793.Google Scholar