Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:39:09.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of rate of gain during the growing and finishing periods on the feed efficiency and carcass composition of the pig: II. Contrasting patterns of growth produced by different rates of gain from 20 to 55 kg and 55 to 87 kg live weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. Walker ,
D. W. Holme  and
T. J. Forbes
N. Walker
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough and Queen's University, Belfast
D. W. Holme
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough and Queen's University, Belfast
T. J. Forbes
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough and Queen's University, Belfast
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pigs were grown at controlled rates of live-weight gain from 20 to 55 kg and from 55 to 87 kg live weight, at which weight they were slaughtered. Six growth-rate treatments were compared and were referred to as High-High (HH), High-Moderate (HM), High-Low (HL), Moderate-High (MH), Moderate-Moderate (MM) and Low-High (LH). The right-hand side of each carcass was divided into the four primary jointsand each joint was physically dissected into bone, skin, subcutaneous fat and lean meat. The boneless tissue of each joint was analyzed for moisture, ether extractable fat and nitrogen.

It was found that an increase in the rate of live-weight gain in the first growth period, tended toimprove the efficiency with which feed was converted into live weight. In the second growth period the efficiency of feed conversion was dependent on the rate of gain both in that period and in the preceding period. Restricted growth in the first period improved the efficiency of feed conversion both in the second period and over the entire experimental period compared with rapid early growth. The implications of compensatory growth are discussed.

There was no treatment effect on carcass length, but hindleg length and ham circumference measurements showed that the proportion of gammon in the side was lower in the HH pigs compared with the other five treatments. This was confirmed by the weight of the gammon joint expressed as a percentage of the trimmed side. There was also a decrease in the proportion of shoulder and an increase in the proportion of middle in the HH pigs. Differences between the other five treatments were small. The changes in conformation were due largely to the effect on fat distribution throughout the side particularly in the gammon and back regions.

The HH treatment resulted in a significant increase in the percentage fat in the side compared witheach of the other five treatments. Within these five treatments there was no significant difference in the percentage fat in the side. This suggests that equal importance may be attached to the rate of live-weight gain in both the growing (20–55 kg) and finishing (55–87 kg) periods in determining the fatnessof the bacon weight carcass.

The treatments had little effect on the chemical composition of the fat-free boneless meat.

The results are discussed in relation to current growth theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 1968 , pp. 319 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boaz, T. G. & Elsley, F. W. H. (1962). The growth and carcasa quality of bacon pigs reared to different weights at 56 days old. Anim. Prod. 4, 13–24.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn.New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Duckworth, J. E. (1965). The influence of pre-weaning nutrition on subsequent growth and development of bacon pigs. Anim. Prod. 7, 165–72.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. (1963). Studies of growth and development in the young pig. II. Acomparison of the performance to 200 lb of pigs reared along different growth curves to 56 days of age. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61, 243–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, V. R. (1964). The response of pigs grown at different rates up to 50 lb live body weight to two subsequent levels of feed intake with particular reference to growth, development and carcass quality. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R. (1966). The application of current carcass knowledge to pig production.PIDA, Second conference to Agricultural Research Workers and Agricultural Economists, Brighton, 01, 1966.Google Scholar
Frape, D. L., Hays, V. W., Speer, V. C., Jones, J. D. & Catron, D. V. (1959). The effect of varied feed intake to 8 weeks of age on growth and development of pigs to 200 lb body weight. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1492 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Geurin, H. B. (1963). Nutrition News Bulletin, 19, no. 3, 07 1963. Ralston Purina Co.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Pigs for pork and pigs for bacon, general considerations. Jl R. agric Soc.Engl. 93, 131–45.Google Scholar
Hellberg, A. (1961). Methods and levels of feeding for pigs. Proc. 8th Int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Hamburg, pp. 205–8.Google Scholar
Hill, F. & O'carroll, F. M. (1962). The chemical composition of pig carcasses at pork, bacon and manufacturing weights. Irish J. agric Res. 1, 115–30.Google Scholar
Lee, M. & Lucia, S. P. (1961). Some relationships between caloric restriction and bodyweight in the rat. II. The metabolism of radioactive glucose and the activity of some TPN-linked enzymes in the liver. J. Nutr. 74, 249–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. & Calder, A. F. C. (1956). The response of different types of pigs to varying levels of feeding from weaning to bacon weight with particular reference to carcass quality. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47, 287–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., Calder, A. F. C. & Smith, H. (1959). The early weaning of pigs. VI. The effects of early weaning and of various growth curves before 50 lb liveweight upon subsequent performance and carcass quality. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., McDonald, I. & Calder, A. F. C. (1960). Some further observations upon the effects of varying the plane of feeding for pigs between weaning and bacon weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 54, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. (1960). Severe undernutrition in growing and adult animals. 1. Production and general effects. Br. J. Nutr. 14, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Mount, L. E. (1960). Severe undernutrition in growing and adult animals. V. Metabolic rate and body temperature in the pig. Br. J. Nutr. 14, 509–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940 a). Growth and development in the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characters. I. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 30, 276–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940 b). Growth and development in the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characters. II. The influence of the plane of nutrition on growth and development. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 30, 387–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940 c). Growth and development in the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characters. III. Effect of the plane of nutrition on the form and composition of the bacon pig. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 30, 511–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, R. J. (1963). Considerations in the limited feeding of growing-finishing swine. Paper presented to American Society of Animal Science (Midwestern Section), Chicago, 11, 1963.Google Scholar
Neilsen, H. E. (1964). Growth rate of piglets as related to their later performance. Annls Zootech. 13, Special no. 1, 169–80.Google Scholar
Oslage, H. J. (1962 a). Body composition and accretion of mattet by growing fattening pigs and the influence of nutrition. II. Body composition and accretion by growing fattening pigs in conditions of normal nutrition. Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 17, 357–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oslage, H. J. (1962 b). Body composition and accretion of matter by growing fattening pigs and the influence of nutrition. III. Influence of a restricted energy intake in the second part of the fattening period on body composition and accretion of matter by growing fattening pigs. Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 18, 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oslage, H. J. (1962 c). Body composition and accretion of matter by growing fattening pigs and the influence of nutrition. IV. Influence of a restricted energy intake in the first part of the fattening period on body composition and accretion of matter by growing fattening pigs. Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 18, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. W. (1964). The plane of nutrition and compensatory growth in pigs. Anim. Prod. 6, 227–36.Google Scholar
Speer, V. C. (1964). Restricted feeding of hogs. Proc. 1964 Maryland Nutrition Conference, p. 37. University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vanschoubroek, F. X., De Wilde, R. O. & Van Spaendonck, R. L. (1965). The influence of the level of feeding of suckled pigs on subsequent performance during fattening. Anim. Prod. 7, 111–18.Google Scholar
Walker, N., Holme, D. W. & Forbes, T. J. (1968). The effect of rate of gain during the growing and finishing periods on feed efficiency and carcass composition of the pig. I. Rate of gain during the growing period from 18 to 57 kg live weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 311–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. M., Sierk, C. F. & Cummings, J. N. (1949). The effect of plane of nutrition on the economy of production and carcass quality of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 8, 132–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed