Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:18:23.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chick rearing: VI. The bacterial syndrome encountered in epidemic bacillary white diarrhoea of chicks (pullorum disease)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Barton Mann
T. Barton Mann
Affiliation:
Biological Research Laboratory, Weatherstones, Neston, Wirral
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The bacterial syndrome encountered in epidemic bacillary white diarrhoea of chicks (pullorum disease) is initially one of invasion by faecal type organisms, this is followed by invasion by anaerogenic B. pullorum.

Evidence is presented to show that ostensibly pure cultures of anaerogenic B. pullorum, consist of two organisms, a true aerogenic B. pullorum in symbiosis with an anaerobe, morphologically of the welchii type.

Evidence is presented to show that variation in fermentation reactions of ostensibly pure cultures of anaerogenic B. pullorum depend upon the degree of symbiosis exerted between the anaerobe and the aerobe and this degree of symbiosis is greatly affected by methods of cultivation on solid media.

It is proposed that the ovarian blight peculiar to adult hens which are carriers of bacillary white diarrhoea infection is caused by putrefaction of ovarian material in vivo by the activities of a morphologically welchii type organism.

It is proposed that B. pullorum exists in one form only, namely, the aerogehic form, and that this organism is a potential pathogen only.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , October 1945 , pp. 214 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, E. M., Dakin, H. D. & West, R. (1926). J. Biol. Chem. 68, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergey, D. H. (1934). Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 4th ed., p. 371. Ballière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Douglas, S. R., Fleming, A. & Colebrook, L. (1917). Lancet, 1, 604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, T. M. (1925). J. Comp. Path. 38, 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edington, J. (1924). J. Path. Bact. 27, no. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, P. (1928). J. Bact. 15, 235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekenstein, W. A. van (1895).Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bos, 14, 203–16.Google Scholar
Gage, G. E. (1922). Bull. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta. No. 5.Google Scholar
Gortner, R. A. (1929). Outlines of Biochemistry, pp. 514–23.Google Scholar
Hadley, P., Caldwell, D. W. & Heath, B. M. (1919). J. Bact. 4, 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, H. & Stacey, M. (1943). Nature, Lond., 151, 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaupp, B. F. (1929). Poultry Diseases, 5th ed., p. 215. Ballière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Lobry de Bruyn, C. A. (1895). Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bos, 14, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. B. (1945). J. Agric. Sci. 35, 98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, H. G. & Goodner, K. (1927). J. Bact. 13, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudge, C. S. (1917). J. Bact. 2, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Bureau of Standards (1942). Circular C440, Polarimetry, Saccharimetry, and the Sugars. U.S.A. Dep. Commerce, p. 168.Google Scholar
Nef, J. U. (1907). Ann. Chem. 357, 214–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nef, J. U. (1914). Ann. Chem. 403, 204–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rettger, L. F. (1930). Rep. Proc. 4th World's Poult. Conor. p. 541.Google Scholar
Truche, C. (1923). Ann. Jnst. Pasteur, 37, no. 5.Google Scholar
Wright, Sir A. (1916–1917). Occ. Lec. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. pp. 1–32. London.Google Scholar