Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:50:50.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Financial Performance, Risk, and Specialization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Barry M. Purdy ,
Michael R. Langemeier  and
Allen M. Featherstone
Barry M. Purdy
Affiliation:
Bank IV in Salina, Kansas
Michael R. Langemeier
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Allen M. Featherstone
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A sample of Kansas farms was used to examine the impact of risk and specialization on mean financial performance. Mean financial performance was hypothesized to be influenced by risk, age of the operator, percentage of acres owned, financial efficiency, leverage, specialization, and farm size. Risk, age of operator, financial efficiency, and farm size had the largest impacts on mean financial performance. Specializing in swine, dairy, or crop production increased mean financial performance, while specializing in beef production decreased mean financial performance. Farms with both crops and a livestock enterprise (beef, swine, or dairy) tended to have less variability in financial performance.

Keywords

financial efficiencyreturn on equityspecialization
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , July 1997 , pp. 149 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, P.J., and Baker, C.B.. “Financial Responses to Risk in Agriculture.” In Risk Management in Agriculture, ed., Barry, P.J.. Ames IA: Iowa State University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Boehlje, M. “Industrialization of Agriculture: What Are the Policy Implications?” In Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, 1995, eds., Halbrook, S.A. and Merry, C.E.. Oak Brook IL: Farm Foundation, 1996.Google Scholar
Boessen, C.R., Featherstone, A.M., Langemeier, L.N., and Burton, R.O. Jr. “Financial Performance of Successful and Unsuccessful Farms.” J. Amer. Soc. Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers 54(April 1990):6–15.Google Scholar
Ellinger, P.N., and Barry, P.J.. “The Effects of Tenure Position on Farm Profitability and Solvency: An Application to Illinois Farms.” Agr. Fin. Rev. 47(1987):106-18.Google Scholar
Farm Financial Standards Council. Recommendations of the Farm Financial Standards Council. Financial Guidelines for Agricultural Producers. American Bankers' Assoc., Washington DC, May 1991.Google Scholar
Fleisher, B.Agricultural Risk Management. Boulder CO: Lynne Reiner Publications, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, S.A., and Shonkwiler, J.S.. “The Effect of Managerial Ability on Farm Financial Success.” Agr. and Resour. Econ. Rev. 23(October 1994):150-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, G., Bergen, P.A., and Dickson, E.. “Why Are Some Farms More Successful than Others? A Review.” In Size, Structure, and the Changing Face of American Agriculture, ed., Hallam, A.. Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Greer, D.F.Industrial Organization and Public Policy, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1984.Google Scholar
Haden, K.L., and Johnson, L.A.. “Factors Which Contribute to the Financial Performance of Selected Tennessee Dairies.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 21(July 1989):105-12.Google Scholar
Hoskisson, R.E., and Hitt, M.A.. Downscoping: How to Tame the Diversified Firm. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, B. “The Diversification of Production.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1 (1993):197–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, G.G., Hill, R.C., Griffiths, W.E., Lutkepohl, H., and Lee, T.C.. Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, J., and Tauer, L.. “Successful Dairy Farm Management Strategies Identified by Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Farm Records.” Northeast. J. Agr. and Resour. Econ. 15(October 1986):168-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kmenta, J.Elements of Econometrics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1971.Google Scholar
Lang, L.H.P., and Stulz, R.M.. “Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance.” J. Polit. Econ. 102(December 1994):1249-80.Google Scholar
Levy, H., and Markowitz, H.M.. “Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 69(June 1979):308-17.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. “Portfolio Selection.” J. Finance 7(March 1952):77–91.Google Scholar
Montgomery, C.A. “Corporate Diversification.” J. Econ. Perspectives 8(Summer 1994):163-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panzer, J.C., and Willig, R.D.. “Economies of Scope.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 71(May 1981):268-72.Google Scholar
Plumley, G.O., and Hornbaker, R.H.. “Financial Management Characteristics of Successful Farm Firms.” Agr. Fin. Rev. 51(1991):9–20.Google Scholar
Robison, L.J., and Barry, P.J.. The Competitive Firm's Response to Risk. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1987.Google Scholar
Schurle, B., and Tholstrup, M.. “Farm Characteristics and Business Risk in Production Agriculture.” N. Cent. J. Agr. Econ. 11(July 1989):183-88.Google Scholar
Sonka, S.T., Hornbaker, R.H., and Hudson, M.A.. “Managerial Performance and Income Variability for a Sample of Illinois Cash Grain Producers.” N. Cent. J. Agr. Econ. 11(January 1989):39–47.Google Scholar
Sonka, S.T., and Patrick, G.F. “Risk Management and Decision Making in Agricultural Firms.” In Risk Management in Agriculture, ed., Barry, P.J.. Ames IA: Iowa State University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Stanton, B.F. “Changes in Farm Size and Structure in American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century.” In Size, Structure, and the Changing Face of American Agriculture, ed., Hallam, A.. Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tauer, L. “Age and Farmer Productivity.” Rev. Agr. Econ. 17(January 1995):63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, J. “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Toward Risk.” Rev. Econ. Stud. 25(February 1958):65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Survey of Current Business. USDC/Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington DC. Various issues, 1985-94.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B., and Montgomery, C.A.. “Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 78(March 1988):246-50.Google Scholar