Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:15:01.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Federal-State Research Programs in Rural Economic Development - - Needs and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Alan R. Bird*
Affiliation:
Economic Development Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

Extract

A joint task force of researchers from state agricultural experiment stations and the U.S. Department of Agriculture has completed a report entitled “Rural Development and the Quality of Living.” This report is an attempt to express the collective judgment of individual scientists and research administrators in regard to the research questions that need to be answered, some evaluation of present efforts, the adequacy of present facilities, and to suggest changes in research to meet present and future needs. The Task Force looked at these twin goals of research: (1) Raise the level of living of rural people, and (2) improve community services and the environment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Urban and Rural America: Policies for Future Growth, Report A-32, Washington, D.C., 1967.Google Scholar
2.Bird, Alan R. and McCoy, John L., White Americans in Rural Poverty, Agr. Econ. Rpt. No. 124, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1967.Google Scholar
3.Hagerman, L. Dale and Braschler, Curtis H., Part I, Analysis of the Impact of Industrialization on a Small Town Economy: A Case Study of Ava, Missouri, and Part II, The Impact of Industrialization of a Small Town on Local Government: A Case Study on Ava, Missouri, Agr. Expt. Sta. Res. Bui. 910, University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo., July 1966.Google Scholar
4.Holmes, O. Wendell, The Impact of Public Spending in a Low-Income Rural Area: A Case Study of Fort Leonard Wood, Mo., Agr. Econ. Rpt. No. 132, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., June 1968.Google Scholar
5.Jordan, Max F.Rural Industrialization in the Ozarks: Case Studv of a New Shirt Plant at Gassville, Ark., Agr. Econ. Rpt. No. 123, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1967.Google Scholar
6.National Advisory Commission on Rural Poverty, Rural Poverty in the United States, Washington, D.C., May 1968.Google Scholar
7.National Advisory Commission on Rural PovertyThe People Left Behind, Washington, D.C., Sept. 1967.Google Scholar
8.People and Income in Rural America: What Are The Choices?, a series of leaflets published by the Agricultural Policy Institute (particularly nos. 7 through 10), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., 1968.Google Scholar
9.U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, Second Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1967, Washington, D.C., 1967.Google Scholar