Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:22:55.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Evaluating Water Conservation Strategies and Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Jeffrey L. Jordan
Jeffrey L. Jordan*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The four papers presented at this invited session examine various ways that economic analysis can be used to examine issues of water conservation strategies and policies. Three of the four are focused on water issues in Texas, and one examines a private insurance contract scheme for irrigation scheduling using Georgia weather and water data. All four papers are well written and interesting, but all four illustrated the limits of conventional economic analysis in its ability to shed light on public policy. This is particularly the case in the heavy reliance on economic efficiency analysis that is employed in the papers.

Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , August 2008 , pp. 503 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rose, S., and CH. Bryan. “Stakeholder Analysis and Social Impacts of Water Reallocation in the ACT and ACF River Systems. Interstate Water Allocation in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia: New Issues, New Methods, New Models, Jordan, J.L. and Wolf, A.T., eds., pp. 159–79. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2006.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.N., Bryan, C.H., and Goodrich, C.G.. Social Impact Assessment: Theory, Process, and Techniques, 3rd ed. Middleton, WI: Social Ecology Press, 2004.Google Scholar