Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:53:00.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Empirical Investigation of Importance Ratings of Meat Attributes by Louisiana and Texas Consumers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jianguo Hui ,
Patricia E. McLean-Meyinsse  and
Dewitt Jones
Jianguo Hui
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA
Patricia E. McLean-Meyinsse
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA
Dewitt Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study provides an empirical investigation of how consumers rate meat attributes. Results show an importance order for 12 selected meat attributes and reveal some relationships between the importance ratings and consumer's demographic or socioeconomic characteristics. The findings suggest that (1) the meat marketing strategy should focus on freshness, taste, and appearance; (2) nutritional attributes have become important factors in the meat purchasing decision of female, educated, and married consumers; (3) older, married, low-income, or non-white consumers still remain price conscious; and (4) USDA label has become an important symbol of meat quality and safety to older, female, Baptist, and high-income consumers.

Keywords

meat attributesimportance ratingsmeat marketingsocioeconomic characteristicsKruskal-Wallis testordered-probit model
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 636 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, J. and Daniel, R.. “Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Consumption of Selected Food Nutrients in the United States.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976): 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beggs, S., Cardell, S., and Hausman, J.. “Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars.” J. Econometrics. 17(1981): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, G.H. and Schweigert, B.S.. “An Overview of Meat in the Diet.” Adv. Meat Res. 6(1990): 1–20.Google Scholar
Capps, O. Jr. and Schmitz, J.D.. “A Recognition of Health and Nutrition Factors in Food Demand Analysis.” W. J. Agr. Econ. 16(1991): 21–35.Google Scholar
Frazao, B. “Female-Headed Households Spend Less on Food.” FoodReview, 16(1993): 6–11.Google Scholar
Frazao, B. “The High Costs of Poor Diets.” FoodReview, 17(1994): 2–3.Google Scholar
Frazao, B. and Cleveland, L.. “Diet-Health Awareness about Fat and Cholesterol-only a Start,” FoodReview, 17(1994): 15–22.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1993: 635–681.Google Scholar
Gibbons, J.D.Nonparametric Methods for Quantitative Analysis. Columbus, Ohio: American Sciences Press, Inc., 1976: 175–193.Google Scholar
Jordan, J.L. and Elnagheeb, A.H.. “Public Perceptions of Food Safety.” J. Food Distr. Res. (September 1991): 13–22.Google Scholar
Manchester, A.C. Rearranging the Economic Landscape: the Food Marketing Revolution, 1950-91. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 660. September 1992.Google Scholar
Menkhaus, D.J., Clair, J.S., and Hallingbye, S.. “A Reexamination of Consumer Buying Behavior for Beef, Pork, and Chicken.” West. J. Agr. Econ. 10(1985): 116-25.Google Scholar
Pehanich, M. “Meat Update: Challenge of Changing Times and Tastes.” Prep. Food. 154(1985): 60–61.Google Scholar
Popkin, B.M., Guilkey, D.K., and Haines, P.S.. “Food Consumption Changes of Adult Women between 1977 and 1985.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71(1989): 949-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, J.J. “American Eating Habits Changing: Part I Meat, Dairy, and Fats and Oils.” FoodReview. 16(1993): 2–11.Google Scholar
Schutz, H.G., Judge, D.S., and Gentry, J.. “The Importance of Nutrition, Brand, Cost, and Sensory Attitudes to Food Purchase and Consumption.” Food Tech. (November 1986): 79–82.Google Scholar
Senauer, B., Asp, E., and Kinsey, J.. Food Trends and the Changing Consumer. St. Paul, Minnesota: Eagan Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Smallwood, D.M., Blisard, N., Blaylock, J.R., and Lutz, S.M.. Food Spending in American Households, 1980-92. Food and Consumer Economics Division, ERS, USDA. October 1994.Google Scholar
Steven, M.L., Smallwood, D.M., Blaylock, J.R., and Hama, M.Y.. Changes in Food Consumption and Expenditures in American Households during the 1980's. ERS, USDA: Statistical Bulletin Number 849.Google Scholar
Steven, M.L.Blaylock, J. R., and Smallwood, D. M. “Household Characteristics Affect Food Choices.” FoodReview. 16(1993): 12–18.Google Scholar
Tippett, K.S. and Goldman, J.D.. “Diets More Healthful, But Still Fall Short of Dietary Guidelines.” FoodReview. 17(1994): 8–14.Google Scholar
Wohlgenant, M.K., Knutson, D.R., Davis, E., and Trapp, J.M.. “Declining Beef Consumption: Insight into Its Causes and Potential Solutions.” 77ie Service. 14(1985): 1–4. Extension Service State Agriculture, Texas A&M Univ.Google Scholar