Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:35:12.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invasive Species and Delaying the Inevitable: Results from a Pilot Valuation Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Christopher R. Mcintosh ,
Jason F. Shogren  and
David C. Finnoff
Christopher R. Mcintosh
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota-Duluth
Jason F. Shogren
Affiliation:
University of Wyoming
David C. Finnoff
Affiliation:
University of Wyoming
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herein we explore the economic value of delaying inevitable environmental damage due to aquatic invasive species, which is a problem especially relevant to tropic and subtropical regions. We developed an analytical framework and tested it using a stated preference survey. The results suggest that delaying the impacts can be valuable. Other tests reveal characteristics of the willingness-to-pay estimates that are consistent with economic theory.

Keywords

environmental damageinvasive aquatic speciesnonmarket valuationQ00Q20Q29
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 39 , Issue s1 , October 2007 , pp. 83 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateman, I., and Willis, K.. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Born, W., Rauschmayer, F., and Brauer, I.. “Economic Evaluation of Biological Invasions—A Survey.” Ecological Economics 55(2005):321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boylen, C.W., Eichler, L.W., and Madsen, J.D.. “Loss of Native Aquatic Plant Species in a Community Dominated by Eurasian Water-milfoil.” Hydrobiologia 415(1999):207-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, K., Kaiser, B., Pitafi, B., and Roumasset, J.. “Prevention, Eradication, and Containment of Invasive Species: Illustrations from Hawaii.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35(2006):63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C.W.Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. Canada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Crocker, T., and Tschirhart, J.. “Ecosystems, Externalities, and Economics.” Environmental and Resource Economics 2(1992):551-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalmazzone, S. “Economic Factors Affecting Vulnerability to Biological Invasions.” Economics of Biological Invasions, Perrings, C., Williamson, M. and Dalmazzone, S. eds. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northhampton, 2000.Google Scholar
Daly, H. “On Economics as a Life Science.” Journal of Political Economy 76(1968):392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P., Levin, S., and Lubshenco, J.. “Economic Pathways to Ecological Sustainability.” Bioscience 50(2000):339-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Itri, F.Zebra Mussels and Aquatic Nuisance Species. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Eddy, S., and Underhill, J.. Northern Fishes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Eiswerth, M., Donaldson, S., and Johnson, W.. “Potential Environmental Impacts and Economic Damages of Eurasian Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in Western Nevada and Northeastern California.” Weed Technology 14(2000):511-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnoff, D., and Tschirhart, J.. “Protecting an Endangered Species While Harvesting Its Prey in a General Equilibrium Ecosystem Model.” Land Economics 79(2003): 160-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullerton, A., Lamberti, G., Lodge, D., and Goetz, F.. “Potential for Resource Competition between Eurasian Ruffe and Yellow Perch: Growth and RNA Responses in Laboratory Experiments.” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129(2000):1331-39.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Invasive Species Programme. Internet site: http://www.gisp.org/ (Accessed February 16, 2007).Google Scholar
Green, W.Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.Google Scholar
Hammitt, J. “Valuing Mortality Risk: Theory and Practice.” Environmental Science & Technology 34(2000): 1396–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, N., and Spash, C.. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1993.Google Scholar
Hanley, N., Shogren, J., and White, B.. Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, A. “Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity.” Econometrica 44(1976):461-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica 46(1978): 1251-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Invasive Species Specialist Group. Global Invasive Species Database. Internet site: http://www.issg.org/database/welcome/ (Accessed February 16, 2007).Google Scholar
Lodge, D.M., and Lorman, J.G.. “Reductions in Submersed Macrophyte Biomass and Species Richness by the Crayfish Orconectes rusticus.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44(1987):591-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, D.M., Stein, R.A., Brown, K.M., Covich, A.P., Bronmark, C., Garvey, J.E., and Klosiewski, S.P.. “Predicting Impact of Freshwater Exotic Species on Native Biodiversity: Challenges in Spatial Scaling.” Australian Journal of Ecology 23(1998):53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, S., and Stone, S.. “The Economic Impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species: A Review of the Literature.” National Council on Economic Education Working Paper 05-02, 2005.Google Scholar
Manca, M., and Ruggiu, D.. “Consequences of Pelagic Food-Web Changes during a Long-Term Lake Oligotrophication Process.” Limnology and Oceanography 43(1998): 1368-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcintosh, C.R., Shogren, J.F., and Finnoff, D.. “Valuing Delaying the Inevitable: Evidence from a National Survey.” University of Minnesota Duluth Working Paper, 2007.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., and Carson, R.. “Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method.” Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1989.Google Scholar
Nunes, P., and van den Bergh, J.. “Can People Value Protection against Invasive Marine Species? Evidence from a Joint TE-CV Survey in the Netherlands.” Environmental and Resource Economics 28(2004):517-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). “Challenges to Fighting Invasive Species.” NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Transcript. 2004. Internet site: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/environment/july-dec04/species_7-1.html. (Accessed April 22, 2006).Google Scholar
Rosch, R., and Schmid, W.. “Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus L.), Newly Introduced into Lake Constance: Preliminary Data on Population Biology and Possible Effects on Whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L.)” Annales Zoologici Fennici 33(1996):467-71.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. “The Value of Changes in Life Expectancy.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(1988): 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savino, J., and Kolar, C.S.. “Competition between Nonindigenous Ruffe and Native Yellow Perch in Laboratory Studies.” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125(1996):562-71.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settle, C., and Shogren, J.. “Does Integrating Economic & Biological Systems Matter for Public Policy? The Case of Yellowstone Lake.” Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy 6(2006): 1352-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogren, J.F., Finnoff, D., Mcintosh, C., and Settle, C.. “Integration-Valuation Nexus in Invasive Species Policy.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35(1)(2006):11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B., and Mendelsohn, R.. “Valuing the Impacts of Large-Scale Ecological Change in a Market: The Effect of Climate Change on U.S. Timber.” American Economic Review 88(1998):686–709.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. Income 2004. Internet site: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/income04/statemhi.html (Accessed January 15, 2006).Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). National Invasive Species Information Center. Internet site: http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/whatis.shtml (Accessed April 22, 2006).Google Scholar
University of Minnesota. 2004. “Round Goby I.D. Card.” Minnesota Sea Grant. 2004. Internet site: http://www.seagrant.umn.edu/exotics/gobyid.html (Accessed April 23, 2006).Google Scholar
Viscusi, W.K., Huber, J., and Bell, J.. “The Value of Regional Water Quality Improvements.” Discussion Paper No. 477. Harvard Law School, 2004.Google Scholar
White, H. “A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity.” Econometrica 48(1980): 817-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.O.Consilience. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1998.Google ScholarPubMed
Worrall, J.Review of Systems for Early Detection and Rapid Response. 2002. Internet site: http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/docs/toolkit/worrallfinal.doc (Accessed April 22, 2006).Google Scholar
Yan, N.D., Girard, R., and Boudreau, S.. “An Introduced Predator (Bythotrephes) Reduces Zooplankton Species Richness.” Ecology Letters 5(2002):481-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, N.D., and Pawson, T.W.. “Changes in the Crustacean Zooplankton Community of Harp Lake, Canada, Following Invasion by Bythotrephes cederstroemi.” Freshwater Biology 37(1997):409-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar