Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:24:04.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Influencing Southern Dairy Farmers' Choice of Milk Handlers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

S. K. Misra
Affiliation:
Department of agricultural economics, Texas Tech University
D. H. Carley
Affiliation:
Department of agricultural and applied economics, Georgia Experiment Station, College of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Georgia
S. M. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of agricultural and applied economics, Georgia Experiment Station, College of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Georgia

Abstract

Survey data of 2,538 dairy farmers located in 12 southern states were used to analyze the factors influencing farmers' choice of milk handlers. Results from a qualitative response model indicate that a combination of price and non-price factors contribute to dairy farmers' attitudes toward their milk handlers. Specifically, the decision to change milk handlers was significantly influenced by prices paid and deductions charged. However, non-price factors including field services, friendly personnel, and loyalty to a handler contributed to the longer term affiliation of dairy farmers with their milk handlers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, C. R., Dabney, W. T., and Voth, D. E.. “Managers’ Perceptions of Member Participation in and Control of Selected Large-Scale Dairy Cooperatives.” Agr. Exper. Station, Univ. of Arkansas. Bulletin 868. 1984.Google Scholar
Boynton, R. D. and Babb, E. M.. “Grade A Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions of Milk Buyer Performance: The Findings of a National Survey.” Agr. Exper. Station, Purdue Univ. Station Bui. No. 367. 1982.Google Scholar
Carley, D. H.Factors Affecting Milk Checks of Southern Dairy Farmers.University of Georgia, Coll. of Agriculture. Southern Cooperative Series Bui. No. 362. 1991.Google Scholar
Carley, D. H., Jacobson, R., McBride, G., and Roberts, J.. “Milk Market Service and Class I Price Alignment Considerations.” A Report to the Board of Directors, Great Lakes-Southern Milk, Inc. Dept. of Agr. Economics, Michigan State Univ. (Special Report unnumbered). 1971.Google Scholar
Greene, W. J.L1MDEP. New York, NY. Econometric Software, Inc. 1990.Google Scholar
Jensen, K.Factors Associated with the Selection of Cooperative vs. Proprietary Handlers of Milk in Tennessee.J. Agr. Cooperation 5(1990):2735.Google Scholar
Liebrand, C. B., Carley, D. H., and Ling, K. C.. “Southern Dairy Farmers’ Evaluation of Milk Handlers.” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Agr. Cooperative Service. Research Rpt. No. 97. 1991.Google Scholar
Liebrand, C. B. and Ling, K. C.. “Value of Cooperative Benefits to Southern Dairy Farmers.” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Agricultural Cooperative Service. Research Rpt. No. 99. 1991.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, A.Paying for Marketwide Services in Fluid Milk Market.” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Agr. Info. Bui. No. 514. 1987.Google Scholar
McFadden, D.Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice.” In Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, eds., Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D., pp. 198272. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1981.Google Scholar
Wilkins, P. C. and Stafford, T. H.. “Dairy Farmers’ Evaluation of Northeastern Dairy Cooperatives.” U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. Agr. Cooperative Service, Research Rpt. No. 19. 1982.Google Scholar