Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:45:37.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Proposed Grain Standards on Marketing Costs of the U.S. Sorghum Sector: An Interregional Transshipment-Plant Location Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Houshmand A. Ziari ,
Stephen Fuller ,
Warren Grant  and
Vinod Sutaria
Houshmand A. Ziari
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Texas
Stephen Fuller
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Texas
Warren Grant
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Texas
Vinod Sutaria
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent legislative initiatives call for studies to evaluate costs associated with cleaning U.S. grains to meet more stringent standards. This paper reports on a study which developed a mixed-integer programming model of the U.S. sorghum sector to (1) determine the least-cost geographic location for new cleaning investment at the country, terminal and port elevator stages of the marketing system and (2) measure additional system marketing costs associated with implementing the proposed standards. Results show the least-cost cleaning location to be at country and terminal elevators in excess supply regions. Implementing the proposed standard would increase system costs about 2 percent.

Keywords

grain qualityplant locationmixed-integersorghum
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , July 1995 , pp. 238 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, B.P., Anderson, K., Noyes, R., Clary, B., Cuperus, G., Fargo, S., Epperly, D., Kenkei, P. and Garrison, C.. “Costs and Benefits of Cleaning Hard Red Winter Wheat and Soft Red Winter Wheats.” Pub. E-920, Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, October 1992.Google Scholar
Barnctt, D., Binkley, J.K. and McCarl, B.A.. “Port Elevator Capacity and National and World Grain Shipments.” W. J. Agr. Econ. 9(1984 1:77–89.Google Scholar
Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A., GAMS: A User's Guide San Francisco: The Scientific Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Byrkett, D.L., Miller, R.A. and Taiganides, E.P.. “Modeling the Optimum Location of the Cattle Feeding Industry.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976):236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chern, W. and Polopolus, L.. “Discontinuous Plant Cost Functions and a Modification of the Stollsteimer Location Model.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 52(1970):581–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Grain Inspection Service, tape of recorded inspections, 1988-1991.Google Scholar
Fuller, S., Grant, W., Fellin, L., Teh, S. and Gutierrez, N., International Grain Transportation Network Model: Grain Sorghum, Contract Report 1, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, September 1990.Google Scholar
Fuller, S., Randolph, P. and Klingman, D.. “Optimal Subindustry Marketing Organization: A Network Analysis Approach.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, W. S.W. Fuller and Bello, H., Cleaning of U.S. Sorghum, Department of Agricultural Economics, Departmental Technical Report No. 92/93-1, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 1992.Google Scholar
Hilger, D.A., McCarl, B.A., and Uhrig, J.W.. “Facilities Location: The Case of Grain Subterminals”, Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 59(1977):674–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, W., Thompson, S.R. and Larson, D.W.. Alternative Transportation Rate and Cost Structure: A Linear Programming Model in Koo, W.W. and Larson, D.W. (eds) Tramportation Models for Agricultural Products. Boulder and London: Westview Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Ladd, G.W. and Lifferth, D.R.. “An Analysis of Alternative Grain Distribution Systems.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 57(1975):420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosely, A.E., Spreen, T.H. and Pheasant, J.W.. “A Mixed-Integer Programming Analysis of the Structure of the Florida-Based Cattle Feeding Industry.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 18(1986): 125–137.Google Scholar
National Grain and Feed Association. Unpublished Survey. 1990.Google Scholar
Tyrchneiwicz, E.W. and Tostrud, R.J.. “A Model for Rationalizing the Canadian Grain Transportation and Handling System on a Regional Basis.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 52(1973):805–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Feed and Grain Market News, Agricultural Marketing Service, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1990, Bureau of Census, 110th edition, 1990.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), Grain Quality in International Trade: A Comparison of Major U.S. Competitors, OTA-F-402, Washington, D.C, U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1989a.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), Enhancing the Quality of U.S. Grain for International Trade, OTA-F-399, Washington, D.C, U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1989b.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate, Hearings before the Subcommittee on Agricultural Research and General Legislation of the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, The One Hundred First Congress, Second Session, Enhancing the Quality of U.S. Grain and Problems that are Associated with Control of Noxious Weeds, February and March, 1990, Washington, D.C, U.S. Government Printing Office, February, 1990.Google Scholar
Ziari, H.A., Fuller, S., Grant, W. and Sutaria, V.. Effect of Proposed Grain Standards on Marketing System Costs: The Sorghum Marketing System. Technical Report 93-2, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, 1993.Google Scholar