Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:18:26.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF LINGUISTICS TO THE STUDY OF HISTORY IN AFRICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1997

DEREK NURSE
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Abstract

The work of historical and comparative linguists has long interested African historians. By classifying languages into families, linguists provide models of their historical development that may point to historical events and processes that occurred among peoples speaking those languages. Once classified, linguists can then reconstruct earlier forms of present languages, thus providing direct evidence of words, their meanings and historical influences in the past. Finally, linguists seek to explain innovations that are revealed in their reconstructions by pointing to a combination of internal linguistic developments and different forms of contact that occurred among speakers of different languages.

Simple classification, based largely on counting cognate words in related languages (a technique known as lexicostatistics), is still a very common activity, however, and thus the one most historians rely on, but lexicostatistics gives only a very limited, and often deceptive, view of language history. Historians should thus be aware of its limitations as well as the potential of a number of important techniques now employed by linguists, including the Comparative Method, reconstruction of ancestral languages, and contact models.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

My thanks are due to C. Beaudoin-Lietz, V. Bubenik, R. M. Blench, C. Ehret, J. Hewson, B. Masele, J. Miller, A. Morris, H. Muzale, P. Newman, T. Schadeberg, T. Spear, A. Traill, and J. Vansina, who have all contributed in one way or another to this essay.