Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:11:26.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Colonial History’ Revisited. A Response to Breman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Vincent Houben
Vincent Houben
Affiliation:
(Leiden University)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the last issue of Itinerario (vol. XVI, 1992/2), Jan Breman of the University of Amsterdam, has published an English translation of his introduction to the third edition of his book Koelies, Planters en Koloniale Politiek. In this article, titled ‘Controversial Views on Writing Colonial History’, Breman tries to deal with some of the ‘more sceptical and sometimes even hostile’ reactions to his book on plantation labour in East Coast Sumatra during the last decades of the nineteenth century. However, his contribution has a more important purport, as he suggests a specific way in which the history of the colonial past should be written, dismissing at the same time the approach to the colonial past undertaken by what he calls the ‘Leiden Revisionist School’.

Type
Historiography
Information
Itinerario , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 93 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 See, for instance, Stoler, Ann Laura, ‘Rethinking Colonial Categories: European Communities and the Boundaries of Rule’, in: Dirks, Nicholas B. ed., Colonialism and Culture (Ann Arbor 1992) 319–352Google Scholar.

2 Houben, V.J.H., ‘Menyang Tanah Sabrang. Javanese Coolie Migration In- and Outside Indonesia 1900–1940’.Paper presented at the Conference on The Malay Archipelago and the World Economy,1790Google Scholar–1990s. Canberra, November 23–27, 1992.

3 Smail, John R.W., ‘On the possibility of an autonomous history of modern Southeast Asia’, Journal of Southeast Asian History 1 (1961) 72–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar.