No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2021
In his well-researched biography, Mike Chinoy chronicles Kevin Boyle's life and career as a scholar, activist and lawyer, bringing to light his under-appreciated role in the civil rights movement in Northern Ireland and the efforts to find a peaceful solution to the conflict, as well as his contributions to human rights movements in the United Kingdom, Europe and the world. Are You With Me? is an important contribution to the literature on the actors who have shaped the norms, institutions and operations of human rights. In its efforts to shed light on one man, the book offers a fresh alternative to state-centric accounts of the origins of human rights. The book offers a portrait of a social movement actor turned legal scholar who used the law to contest the social inequalities against the minority community to which he belonged and to push for a solution to the underlying political conflict, as well as revelations of the complex power dynamics between human rights lawyers and the social movements they represent. In these respects Are You With Me? also provides valuable insights for socio-legal scholars, especially those focusing on legal mobilisation. At the same time the book could have provided a fuller and more complex biographical account had Chinoy been geographically and linguistically comprehensive in selecting his interviewees. The exclusion of Kurdish lawyers and human rights advocates is noticeable, particularly in light of the inclusion of Boyle's local partners in other contexts, such as South Africa.
Fellow, Hertie School, Berlin (Germany); [email protected].
1 McCann, Michael, ‘Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives’ (2006) 2 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 17, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Branch, Taylor, Parting the Waters: America in the King Years 1954–63 (Simon & Schuster Paperbacks 1988)Google Scholar; Glennon, Robert Jerome, ‘The Role of Law in the Civil Rights Movement: The Montgomery Bus Boycott, 1955–1957’ (1991) 9 Law and History Review 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Keefe, Patrick Radden, Say Nothing: A True Story of Murder and Memory in Northern Ireland (Doubleday 2019)Google Scholar; O'Doherty, Malachi, Fifty Years On: The Troubles and the Struggle for Change in Northern Ireland (Atlantic Books 2019)Google Scholar; Coogan, Tim Pat, The Troubles: Ireland's Ordeal 1966–1996 and the Search for Peace (St Martin's Griffin 2002)Google Scholar; McKittrick, David and McVea, David, Making Sense of the Troubles: The Story of the Conflict in Northern Ireland (New Amsterdam Books 2002)Google Scholar.
4 Branch (n 2).
5 Boyle, Kevin, Article 19 World Report 1988: Information, Freedom and Censorship (Times Books 1988)Google Scholar.
6 For a deeply personal and disturbing account of the whole affair from the perspective of its protagonist, see Rushdie, Salman, Joseph Anton: A Memoir (Vintage 2012)Google Scholar.
7 ECtHR, Sejdić and Finci v Bosnia and Herzegovina, App nos 27996/06 and 34836/06, 22 December 2009.
8 EComHR, Donnelly and Six Others v United Kingdom, App nos 5577/72 and 5583/72 (Second Decision, 15 December 1975) part IX.
9 ibid 77. See also Hannum, Hurst and Boyle, Kevin, ‘The Donnelly Case, Administrative Practice and Domestic Remedies under the European Convention: One Step Forward and Two Steps Back’ (1977) 71 American Journal of International Law 316CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 ECtHR, Dudgeon v United Kingdom, App no 7525/76, 22 October 1981, para 70.
11 Lawrence v Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), para 46.
12 The protests would culminate in the 1980–81 hunger strikes, which would become a showdown between the prisoners and the Thatcher government. By the end of the second strike, ten IRA prisoners had starved themselves to death. The incidents turned Bobby Sands, the first to die, into a popular culture figure. For examples of films dedicated to Sands, see Terry George's Some Mother's Son and Steve McQueen's Hunger.
13 ECtHR, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v Norway, App no 21980/93, 20 May 1999.
14 ECtHR, Akdıvar and Others v Turkey, App no 21893/93, 16 September 1996, paras 70–77.
15 ECtHR, Aksoy v Turkey, App no 21987/93, 18 December 1996, paras 58–64.
16 ECtHR, Aydın v Turkey, App no 57/1996/676/866, 25 September 1997, paras 80–86.
17 Solvang, Ole, ‘Chechnya and the European Court of Human Rights: The Merits of Strategic Litigation’ (2008) 3 Security and Human Rights 208Google Scholar; van der Vet, Freek, ‘Seeking Life, Finding Justice: Russian NGO Litigation and Chechen Disappearances before the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 13 Human Rights Review 303CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Anagnostou, Dia, ‘From Belfast to Diyarbakir and Grozny via Strasbourg: Transnational Legal Mobilisation against State Violations in Contexts of Armed Conflict’ in Anagnostou, Dia (ed), Rights and Courts in Pursuit of Social Change: Legal Mobilisation in the Multi-Level European System (Hart 2014) 157Google Scholar.
18 Lauren, Paul Gordon, The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen (University of Pennsylvania Press 1998)Google Scholar.
19 Morsink, Johannes, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and Intent (University of Pennsylvania Press 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Clark, Ann Marie, Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms (Princeton University Press 2001)Google Scholar.
21 Goldhaber, Michael D, A People's History of the European Court of Human Rights (Rutgers University Press 2007)Google Scholar.
22 Johnson, Paul, Going to Strasbourg: An Oral History of Sexual Orientation Discrimination and the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 Scheingold, Stuart A, The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change (Yale University Press 1974)Google Scholar; Burstein, Paul, ‘Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity’ (1991) 96 American Journal of Sociology 1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hilson, Chris, ‘New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity’ (2002) 9 Journal of European Public Policy 238CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Winn, Jane Kaufman and Yeh, Tang-chi, ‘Advocating Democracy: The Role of Lawyers in Taiwan's Political Transformation’ (1995) 20 Law & Social Inquiry 561CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 Andersen, Ellen Ann, Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation (The University of Michigan Press 2005) 216Google Scholar.
26 The only time Dudgeon mentions Boyle is to credit him for the idea to go to Strasbourg (‘It was all Kevin's idea’): Goldhaber (n 21) 34.
27 Johnson (n 22) 79.
28 Ibid.
29 Kurban, Dilek, Limits of Supranational Justice: The European Court of Human Rights and Turkey's Kurdish Conflict (Cambridge University Press 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 For a personal account of the case and the litigation process, see Hasip Kaplan, Bir Onur Kavgası: Cizre'den Strasbourg'a Yeşilyurt Dışkı Yedirme Davası (Belge Uluslararası Yayıncılık 1996).
31 EComHR, Gürdoğan, Müştak, Müştak and Müştak v Turkey, App nos 15202/89, 15203/89, 15204/89 and 15205/89, Decision (Friendly Settlement), 12 January 1993.