Article contents
Comments on Protocol I
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 January 2010
Extract
Protocol I additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 is a product of the mid-1970s. It reflects the then-prevailing Zeitgeist: the confrontational mentality of the Cold War; the defiance of the West by a suddenly assertive and temporarily united “Third World”; the tendencies on the part of an entrenched majority in international organizations and forums to show no tolerance for the dissenting voices of a large and influential minority; and the cynical sacrifice of good sense (and good law) on the altar of political expediency.
- Type
- 20th anniversary of the 1977 Additional Protocols
- Information
- International Review of the Red Cross (1961 - 1997) , Volume 37 , Special Issue 320: 20th anniversary of the 1977 Additional Protocols , October 1997 , pp. 515 - 519
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 1997
References
1 Dinstein, Y., “The new Geneva Protocols: A step forward or backward?”, Year Book of World Affairs, Vol. 33, 1979, pp. 269–272.Google Scholar
2 Dinstein, Y., “Siege warfare and the starvation of civilians”, in Delissen, A. J. M. and Tanja, G. J. (eds), Humanitarian law of armed conflict: Challenges ahead. Essays in honour of Frits Kalshoven, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1991, pp. 148–152.Google Scholar
3 Dinstein, Y., “Comments”, American University Law Review, Vol. 31, 1982, pp. 849–853.Google Scholar
4 Dinstein, Y., “Another step in codifying the laws of war”, Year Book of World Affairs, Vol. 28, 1974, pp. 280–282.Google Scholar
5 International Legal Materials, Vol. 33, 1994, p. 1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 See Preamble, ibid., p. 1311.
- 4
- Cited by