Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:00:15.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Protocol I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2010

Yoram Dinstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Protocol I additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 is a product of the mid-1970s. It reflects the then-prevailing Zeitgeist: the confrontational mentality of the Cold War; the defiance of the West by a suddenly assertive and temporarily united “Third World”; the tendencies on the part of an entrenched majority in international organizations and forums to show no tolerance for the dissenting voices of a large and influential minority; and the cynical sacrifice of good sense (and good law) on the altar of political expediency.

Type
20th anniversary of the 1977 Additional Protocols
Information
International Review of the Red Cross (1961 - 1997) , Volume 37 , Special Issue 320: 20th anniversary of the 1977 Additional Protocols , October 1997 , pp. 515 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dinstein, Y., “The new Geneva Protocols: A step forward or backward?”, Year Book of World Affairs, Vol. 33, 1979, pp. 269–272.Google Scholar

2 Dinstein, Y., “Siege warfare and the starvation of civilians”, in Delissen, A. J. M. and Tanja, G. J. (eds), Humanitarian law of armed conflict: Challenges ahead. Essays in honour of Frits Kalshoven, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1991, pp. 148–152.Google Scholar

3 Dinstein, Y., “Comments”, American University Law Review, Vol. 31, 1982, pp. 849–853.Google Scholar

4 Dinstein, Y., “Another step in codifying the laws of war”, Year Book of World Affairs, Vol. 28, 1974, pp. 280–282.Google Scholar

5 International Legal Materials, Vol. 33, 1994, p. 1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 See Preamble, ibid., p. 1311.