Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T05:02:05.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allied High Commission for Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Get access

Extract

With the development of certain administrative frictions (concerning coal quotas, occupation costs, and the scrap metal treaty) between the western occupying powers and the German Federal Republic, early indications were that if the talk of “contractual agreements” did materialize it would reserve, for the occupying powers, wide controls over important areas of west Germany's internal and external affairs. In Washington, however, a general modification of approach was noted during the September discussions between the United States Secretary of State (Acheson), the United Kingdom Foreign Secretary (Morrison), and the French Foreign Minister (Schuman), preparatory to the Ottawa meetings of the North Atlantic Council.

Type
International Organizations: Summary of Activities: IV. War and Transitional Agencies
Information
International Organization , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , November 1951 , pp. 825 - 832
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Times, London, 08 13, 1951Google Scholar.

2 New York Times, August 22, 1951; ibid., September 3, 1951.

3 Ibid., July 31, 1951.

4 Ibid., September 11, 1951.

5 For the texts of the Communiqué and the Declaration, see Department of State, Bulletin, XXV, p. 485–486Google Scholar.

6 The Times, London, 09 14, 1951Google Scholar.

7 New York Times, September 14, 1951.

8 Ibid., September 24; ibid., October 10, 1951.

9 Ibid., September 24, 1951.

10 Ibid., September 30, 1951.

11 ibid., October 3, 1951.

12 Ibid., October 3, 1951; ibid., October 8, 1951.

13 Ibid., October 3, 1951.

14 Ibid., October 8, 1951.

15 Ibid., October 11, 1951.

16 Ibid., October 20, 1951.

17 Ibid.

18 Ibid., September 25, 1951.

19 Ibid.

20 Ibid., September 28, 1951.

21 Ibid., September 30, 1951.

2 Ibid., October 7, 1951.

23 Ibid., October 11, 1951.

24 Ibid., October 8, 1951.

25 Ibid., October 11, 1951.

26 Ibid.

27 Ibid., October 14, 1951.

28 Ibid., October 16, 1951; for the text of the High Commissioners' note, see this issue, documents section.

29 New York Times, October 16, 1951.

30 For a summary of the Petersburg Plan and of the Pleven Plan, see International Organization, V, p. 645.

31 New York Times, October 14, 1951.

32 Ibid., October 20, 1951.

33 Ibid., August 4, 1951.

34 Department of State, Bulletin, XXV, p. 358Google Scholar. the purpose of making preparations “for the settlement of 1) German prewar external debts and 2) debts arising out of postwar economic assistance.”

35 New York Times, September 4, 1951.

36 Ibid., September 21, 1951.

37 Ibid., October 21, 1951.

38 Ibid., October 2, 1951.

39 United States Department of State Press Release 792, August 31, 1951.

40 International Organization, V, p. 412; New York Times, October 20, 1951.

41 International Organization, V, p. 644.

42 The Times, London, 09 8, 1951Google Scholar.

43 Department of State, Bulletin, XXV, p. 259Google Scholar.

44 New York Times, September 4, 1951.

45 The International Authority for the Ruhr, Report…, Düsseldorf, February 14, 1951.

46 New York Times, October 19, 1951; ibid., October 20, 1951.

47 The Schuman Plan treaty had already passed the Bundestag on the first reading. Two more readings were required before the final ratification. See International Organization, V, p. 635.

48 Department of State, Bulletin, XXV, p. 292Google Scholar.

49 Ibid., p. 407.

50 The Times, London, 09 14, 1951Google Scholar.

51 New York Times, September 28, 1951.