Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:04:41.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asian-African Legal Consultative Committee: Bilateral Models for Judicial Assistance*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Treaties and Agreements
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the Report of the Secretary-General of the Asian-African Legal Consultative Committee on "Mutual Assistance for the Service of Process, Issue of Letters Rogatory and the Taking of Evidence both in Civil and Criminal Matters" , Document No. AALCC/XXIIl/4, pp. 1-6 and 11-52.

[The Draft Model Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance for the Service of Process and the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters appear at I.L.M. page 83. The Draft Model Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance on Letters Rogatory in Criminal Matters appear at I.L.M. page 103. Provisions on which there is a difference of view are bracketed in the tex t.

[At the Tokyo Session of the Asian-African Legal Consultative Committee , held in May 1983, i t was decided to invite further comments from Member Governments and prepare the final text for the 1984 Session of the Committee. No major changes are anticipated , and some Governments have already begun to negotiate on the basis of the drafts.]

References

page 89 note * The representatives of Thailand and Singapore reserved their position on the provisions of this Article.

page 92 note * The representative of Singapore reserved his position on this Article.

page 96 note * As referred to in Article 10 of the Draft of Model Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance for the Service of Process and the Taking of Evidence Abroad i n Civil or Commercial Matters.

page 96 note ** This form must be draw up in duplicate, one being the original,the other the copy.

page 97 note * Delete whichever is inapplicable.

page 98 note * Article 12 of the Draft of Model Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance for the Service of Process and the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters.

page 99 note * Article 11 of the Draft of Model Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance for the Service of Process and the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commeroial Matters.

page 99 note ** If appropriate, identity and address of the person interested in the transmission of the document.

page 100 note * As referred to in Article 16 of the Draft of Blodel Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance for the Service of Process and the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters.

page 102 note * Delete whichever i s inapplicable.

page 113 note * As referred to i n Article 7 of the Draft of Model Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance on Letters Rogatory in Criminal Matters.

page 113 note ** This form must be drawn up in duplicate, one being the original ,the other the oopy.

page 114 note * Delete whichever is inapplicable.

page 115 note * Article 10 of the Draft of Model Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance on Letters Rogatory in Criminal Matters.

page 116 note * Article 8 of the Draft of Model Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance on Letters Rogatory in Criminal Matters.

page 116 note ** If appropriate, identity and address of the person interested in the transmission of the document

page 117 note * As referred to in Article 7 of the Draft of Model Bilateral Arrangements on Mutual Assistance on Letters Rogatory in Criminal Matters.

page 119 note * Delete whichever is inapplicable.