Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:09:24.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Government of Kuwait v. American Independent Oil Company (Aminoil)

United States.  24 March 1982 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law in general — Sources — General principles of law — Role and importance — Resolutions of the General Assembly of the United Nations — Resolutions on nationalization of foreignowned property — Value as sources of international law

International law in general — Relation to municipal law — Governing law of oil concession — Reference to laws of the host State and the concessionaire’s State and to general principles — Whether including public international law — International law and the law of Kuwait

States as international persons — In general — Sovereignty and independence — In matters of domestic jurisdiction — Oil concession — Concession granted while Kuwait a protected State — Effect of independence — Effect of Kuwait Constitution — Whether concession ‘colonial’ — Whether stabilization clause in Concession still to be regarded as valid

States as international persons — Dependent States and territories — Protected States and protectorates — Kuwait — Oil concession granted while Kuwait a protected State — Effect of — Whether concession 'colonial' in character — Whether stabilization clauses to be regarded as valid

States as international persons — State succession — Succession with regard to contractual obligations and concessions — Oil concession granted while Kuwait a protected State — Effect of independence — Whether concession 'colonial' in character — Whether stabilization clauses valid

State territory — Miscellaneous — Kuwait — Saudi Arabia Neutral Zone — Status of oil concession granted by Kuwait in Zone

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For taking of, or interference with, property — Nationalization — Requirements for lawful nationalization — Nationalization of concession — Compensation

State responsibility — Damages — Award of damages in general — Nationalization of concession — Relation between measure of damages for unlawful nationalization and compensation for lawful nationalization — Equitable measure of compensation — Loss of profits — Duty of Tribunal to take account of legitimate expectations of parties under concession — Effect of inflation

State responsibility — Interest — In general — Award of interest in addition to award of compensating allowance for effects of inflation

State responsibility — Interest — Rate of interest — Compound interest — Award of compound interest

State responsibility — Interest — The dies a quo — Award of compensation for nationalization of oil concession — Arbitration Award made four and a half years after date of nationalization — Award of interest from date of nationalizatio~ to date on which parties complied with Award

Disputes — Arbitration — In general — The law applied by arbitral tribunals — Transnational arbitration between State and foreign company — Lex arbitri — Law governing substantive issues

Disputes — Arbitration — Procedure — Determination of rules of procedure by the Tribunal

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of State responsibility — For revocation of, or interference with, concessions or concessionary contracts — Law nationalizing concession — Dual nature of law as act of nationalization and termination of a contract — Conditions of lawful nationalization — Requirement of public benefit — Nondiscrimination — Role of stabilization clauses in concession — Stabilization clause in general terms — Whether forbidding nationalization — Permanent sovereignty over natural resources — Whether giving rise to a new rule of ius cogens — Evolution of concession — Effect of negotiation — Whether gradual recognition of State's dominant position in relation to concession — Whether overriding stabilization clauses

Concession — Clause requiring parties to negotiate if general trend in Middle East concessions arises which benefits concessionary States — Nature of a duty to negotiate — Whether a duty to agree — Parties agreeing on issues of principle but failing to agree on details — Whether Tribunal entitled to complete their agreement — Abu Dhabi Formula concerning taxation of oil companies' profits — Parties unable to agree upon detail of application to concession — Nationalization of concession — Whether concessionaire under an obligation to make payment to government in respect of past profits — Whether Tribunal entitled to calculate amount — Agreement amending concession applied on provisional basis — Concessionaire never receiving quid pro quo — Status of agreement — Duress — Whether economic pressure on concessionaire amounts to duress.

Duty of concessionaire to observe “good oil-field practice” — Whether discharged — Relative nature of obligation

Compensation for lawful nationalization — Whether based on net book value — Whether based on loss of profits — Need to satisfy legitimate expectations of parties — Reasonable rate of return — Method of calculation — Allowance for effects of inflation — Interest — Award of compound interest from date of nationalization — Additional award of allowance for inflation

Liabilities of nationalized concern — Assumption of liabilities by government — Whether company required to compensate Government

International law in general — Sources — Resolution of General Assembly — Practice of States and companies involved in oil industry — Relation of international law to law of Kuwait

Arbitration — Law applied by Arbitration Tribunal — Lex arbitri — Proper law of concession — Duty of Tribunal

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)