Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:55:39.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attorney-General of the Government of Israel v. Adolf Eichmann

Israel.  12 December 1961 ; 29 May 1962 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law in general — Sources — Customary international law — Development of — Use of analogy — General principles of law — Relationship to international morality.

International law in general — Relation to municipal law — Jurisdiction of national courts — When custody of prisoner secured by breach of international law — Whether court entitled to exercise universal jurisdiction — Relationship of statute and customary international law — Presumption that there is no conflict — Primacy of statute — The law of Israel.

Recognition of acts of foreign States — Whether Act of State a defence to charges of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.

Jurisdiction — In general — Territorial — Over foreigners — In respect of offences committed abroad — Application of Israel legislation regarding crimes against Jews — Principles of universality, passive personality and protection.

Jurisdiction — In general — Territorial — Irregular apprehension — Seizure of accused in Argentina by agents of Israel Government — Whether affecting jurisdiction of Israel courts — Effect of waiver of breach of international law by Government concerned — Retroactivity of law.

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For wrongs unconnected with contractual obligations — Acts of State officials — Abduction — Reparation — Nature of

The individual in international law — Extradition — In general — Abduction — Whether principle of specialty applies.

War — In general — Enforcement of Jaws of war — Punishment of war crimes and crimes against humanity — Defence of superior orders — Genocide as a crime under international law — Principle of nullum crimen sine lege.

The individual in international law — In general — Position of — Responsibility for war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity — Effect upon individual of irregular apprehension — Whether individual direct beneficiary of international law — Right of State in which apprehension occurred and of national State to waive claim arising therefrom — Relevance of extradition procedure — Human rights and freedoms — European Convention for Protection of — Right to freedom and personal security — Application of Convention by courts of State not a party.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)