Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:18:59.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antixenosis and antibiosis components of resistance to pod borer Helicoverpa armigera in wild relatives of pigeonpea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

G. Sujana ,
H.C. Sharma  and
D. Manohar Rao
G. Sujana
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India Department of Genetics, Osmania University, Hyderabad500 017, Andhra Pradesh, India
H.C. Sharma*
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India
D. Manohar Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Osmania University, Hyderabad500 017, Andhra Pradesh, India
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The legume pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)) is one of the most important pests of pigeonpea. The levels of resistance to H. armigera in the cultivated germplasm are quite low, and therefore there is a need to introgress resistance genes from wild relatives into the cultigen. We evaluated a diverse array of wild relatives of pigeonpea for oviposition non-preference and antibiosis components of resistance to H. armigera. The accessions ICPW 1 (Cajanus acutifolius), ICPW 13 and 14 (C. albicans), ICPW 159 and 160 (C. sericeus), ICPW 68 (C. platycarpus), ICPW 83, 90, 94, 125, 137, 141 and 280 (C. scarabaeoides), ICPW 207 (Paracalyx scariosa) and ICPW 210 (Rhynchosia aurea) showed high levels of antixenosis for oviposition under no-choice, dual-choice and multi-choice conditions. High levels of antibiosis were observed when the larvae were reared on leaves and/or pods of C. acutifolius (ICPW 1), C. cajanifolius (ICPW 29), C. sericeus (ICPW 160), P. scariosa (ICPW 207), C. scarabaeoides and C. albicans. Lyophilized leaf or pod powder incorporated into the artificial diet can be used to assess antibiosis to H. armigera, and high levels of antibiosis to H. armigera were observed in diets with leaf and/or pod powder of some of the accessions of C. acutifolius, C. lineatus, C. sericeus, C. scarabaeoides, C. platycarpus, P. scariosa and R. aurea. Post-embryonic development period was prolonged in insects reared on leaves and pods of wild relatives of pigeonpea. The accessions showing high levels of antixenosis and antibiosis can be used to increase the levels and diversify the bases of resistance to H. armigera in pigeonpea.

Keywords

Helicoverpa armigerapigeonpeawild relativesresistance mechanisms
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 191 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armes, N. J., Bond, G. S. and Cooter, R. J. (1992) The Laboratory Culture and Development of Helicoverpa armigera. Bulletin No. 57. Natural Resources Institute, Chatham, UK.Google Scholar
Brar, D. and Khush, G. (1997) Alien introgression in rice. Plant Molecular Biology 35, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahms, R. G. (1972) The role of host plant resistance in integrated insect control, pp. 152–167. In Control of Sorghum Shoot Fly (Edited by Jotwani, M. G. and Young, W. R.). Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Dodia, D. A., Patel, A. J., Patel, I. S., Dhulia, F. K. and Tikka, S. B. S. (1996) Antibiotic effect of pigeonpea wild relatives on Helicoverpa armigera. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter 3, 100–101.Google Scholar
Firempong, S. and Zalucki, M. P. (1990) Host plant selection by Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): role of certain plant attributes. Australian Journal of Zoology 37, 675–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitt, G. P. (1989) The ecology of Heliothis to agro-ecosystems. Annual Review of Entomology 34, 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. W. C., Sharma, H. C., Stevenson, P. C. and Simmonds, M. S. J. (2006) Susceptibility of pigeonpea and some of its wild relatives to predation by Helicoverpa armigera: implications for breeding resistant cultivars. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 831–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. W. C., Stevenson, P. C., Simmonds, M. S. J. and Sharma, H. C. (2002) Can larvae of the pod-borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), select between wild and cultivated pigeonpea [Cajanus sp. (Fabaceae)]? Bulletin of Entomological Research 92, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. W. C., Stevenson, P. C., Simmonds, M. S. J. and Sharma, H. C. (2003) Phenolic compounds on the pod surface of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan, mediate feeding behaviour of larvae of Helicoverpa armigera. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29, 811–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajjar, R. and Hodgkin, T. (2007) The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the past 20 years. Euphytica 156, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartlieb, E. and Rembold, H. (1996) Behavioral response of female Helicoverpa (Heliothis) armigera (Hub). (Lepidopetera: Noctuidae) moths to synthetic pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) kairomone. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 821–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) (1992) The Medium Term Plan. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India.Google Scholar
Kranthi, K. R., Jadhav, D. R., Kranthi, S., Wanjari, R. R., Ali, S. S. and Russel, D. A. (2002) Insecticide resistance in five major insect pests of cotton in India. Crop Protection 21, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumari, A. D., Sharma, H. C. and Reddy, D. J. (2006) Oviposition non-preference as component of resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera in pigeonpea. Journal of Applied Entomology 130, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, A. J., Shanower, T. G. and Romeis, J. (1995) The role of plant trichomes in insect resistance: a selective review. Phytophaga 7, 41–64.Google Scholar
Reed, W. and Lateef, S. S. (1990) Pigeonpea: pest management, pp. 349–374. In The Pigeonpea (Edited by Nene, Y. L., Hall, S. D. and Sheila, V. K.). CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Romeis, J., Shanower, T. G. and Peter, A. J. (1999) Trichomes on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and two wild Cajanus spp. Crop Science 39, 564–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, K. B., Kumar, R. V., Madhavi Latha, K. and Dalvi, V. A. (2006) Commercial pigeonpea hybrids are just a few steps away. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 19, 7–16.Google Scholar
Shanower, T. G., Yoshida, M. and Peter, A. J. (1997) Survival, growth, fecundity and behavior of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on pigeonpea and two wild Cajanus species. Journal of Economic Entomology 90, 837–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. C. (ed.) (2005) Heliothis/Helicoverpa Management: Emerging Trends and Strategies for Future Research. Oxford and IBH Publishers, New Delhi, India. 469 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. C., Ahmad, R., Ujagir, R., Yadav, R. P., Singh, R. and Ridsdill-Smith, T. J. (2005) Host plant resistance to cotton bollworm/legume pod borer, Heliothis/Helicoverpa, pp. 167–208. In Heliothis/Helicoverpa Management: Emerging Trends and Strategies for Future Research (Edited by Sharma, H. C.). Oxford and IBH Publishers, New Delhi, India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. C., Green, P. W. C., Stevenson, P. C. and Simmonds, M. S. J. (2001) What makes it tasty for the pest? Identification of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) feeding stimulants and location of their production on the pod-surface of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Competitive Research Facility Project R7029 C. Final Technical Report. Department for International Development, London, UK.Google Scholar
Sison, M. J. and Shanower, M. G. (1994) Development and survival of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on short duration pigeonpea. Journal of Economic Entomology 87, 1749–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slansky, F. Jr (1982) Insect nutrition: an adaptationist's perspective. The Florida Entomologist 65, 46–71.Google Scholar
Yoshida, M. and Shanower, T. G. (2000) Helicoverpa armigera larval growth inhibition in artificial diet containing freeze-dried pigeonpea pod powder. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 17, 37–41.Google Scholar
Zalucki, M. P., Daglish, G., Firempong, S. and Twine, P. H. (1986) The biology and ecology of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia: what do we know? Australian Journal of Zoology 34, 779–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar