Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:16:45.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VP35 Economic Consequences Of A Restricted Dutch Sexually Transmitted Infection-Testing Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
INTRODUCTION:

Due to the rising costs caused by an increasing demand for Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) care, the Dutch government changed the funding of STI-clinics (1). A more restrictive testing policy introduced in 2015 no longer required syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests for younger, heterosexual clients. A less extensive testing policy could be detrimental to the aim of finding and treating STIs (2,3). Infections that remain undetected could possibly lead to an increase in both the total and individual burden of disease, due to transmission and the need for more intensive treatment resulting in higher healthcare costs in the long term. In this study, we evaluated the new Dutch testing policy with respect to intended savings and missed syphilis and/or HIV infections. Moreover, we explored the efficiency of alternative test policies.

METHODS:

Using national surveillance data from 2011 to 2013 with still comprehensive testing for all, we estimated the effects of restrictive testing on test costs, number of infections missed, costs per missed infection, costs per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) lost, and calculated the net monetary benefit.

RESULTS:

The 2015-policy led to estimated savings of EUR1.1 million, while missing approximately three of ten HIV infections and seven of twenty syphilis infections among all younger heterosexual clients (in total 143,612 consultations) per year. Savings were EUR435,000 per QALY lost. Standard testing second-generation immigrants for syphilis and HIV saved EUR525,000/QALY lost. Offering an HIV test when diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhoea resulted in savings of EUR568,000/ QALY lost.

CONCLUSIONS:

The 2015-testing policy resulted in substantial savings as few missed HIV and syphilis infections caused QALY losses. Additional standard syphilis and HIV tests for second-generation immigrants and an additional HIV test in case of positive chlamydia or gonorrhoea diagnosis could reduce missed infections in a cost-effective way.

Type
Vignette Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

References

REFERENCES:

1. Suijkerbuijk, AW, Over, EA, Koedijk, FD, et al. More efficient testing policy at STI clinics. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde 2014, 158:A6980.Google Scholar
2. Leibowitz, AA, Byrnes, K, Wynn, A, Farrell, K. HIV tests and new diagnoses declined after california budget cuts, but reallocating funds helped reduce impact. Health affairs (Project Hope) 2014, 33 (3):418426.Google Scholar
3. O'Riordan, M, Fitzpatrick, F. The impact of economic recession on infection prevention and control. J Hosp Infect. 2015, 89 (4):340345.Google Scholar