Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T05:53:03.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Internet Information Sources for the Identification of Emerging Health Technologies: A Starting Point

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Evelinda Trindade
Affiliation:
Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA)
Leigh-Ann Topfer
Affiliation:
Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA)
Mara De Giusti
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Abstract

The basis of an early warning system for new and emerging health technologies is information, and in particular, information that has been selectively extracted from the huge quantity of data in the fields of medicine, science, and biobusiness. The information will be useful only if presented in a format suitable to the needs of health care decision makers and produced at the time most likely to influence the introduction or diffusion of new technologies. In 1997 the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA) began a one-year pilot project to identify and provide information on developments in medical technologies that may have a significant impact on health care in Canada. We began by examining the information available to us through the Internet, based on the assumption that electronic sources can offer more timely access to a greater range of information, often with little or no cost involved. It was important to identify the sites that offered the most relevant information in the least amount of time.

Type
Special Section: Early Identification and Assessment of Emerging Health Technology
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment. Strategic plan. Ottawa: CCOHTA, 1996.Google Scholar
2.Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The Canadian guide to clinical preventive health care. Ottawa: Canada Communication Group—Publishing, 1994. Available from URL: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hppb/healthcarepubs/clinical_preventive.htmlGoogle Scholar
3.Cook, D. J., Guyatt, G. H., Laupacis, A., & Sackett, D. L.Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest, 1992, 102(suppl.): 305S–311S.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Jovell, A. J., & Navarro-Rubio, M. D.Evaluaciûn de la evidencia cientìfica. Medicina Clinica, 1995, 105, 740–43.Google Scholar
5.McKenzie, B. C.Quality standards for health information on the Internet. SIM Quarterly: The Newsletter of the Society for the Internet in Medicine. 1997, 3:15 (5 screens). Available from URL: http://www.cybertas/dernon.co.uk/simq/issue3/editorial.htmlGoogle Scholar
6.Mowatt, G., Bower, D. J., Brebner, J. A., et al. When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: A comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies. Health Technology Assessment. 1997, 1, 1149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Net work (SIGN) draft criteria for appraisal of clinical guidelines. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercol legiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), 1997, 111. Available from URL: http://www.pc47.cee.hw.ac.uk/sign/home.htmlGoogle Scholar
8.Smith, A.Criteria for evaluation of Internet information resources. VUW Department of Library and Information Studies, New Zealand, 03 2, 1997. Available from URL: http://www.vuw.ac.nz/~agsmith/evaln/index.htmGoogle Scholar