Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:57:34.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patents, Biopolitics, and Feminisms: Locating Patent Law Struggles over Breast Cancer Genes and the Hoodia Plant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2012

Laura A. Foster
Laura A. Foster*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Gender Studies, Indiana University, Bloomington; Faculty Affiliate, Center for Intellectual Property Research, Indiana University Maurer School of Law. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article suggests three critical inquiries for formulating a feminist analysis of patent law. The first questions how patent law functions as a strategy within neoliberal, biopolitics. The second examines how patent law is structured through biopolitical techniques of governance by examining two conceptions of the public domain I call open public domain and protective public domain. The third inquiry, drawing upon feminist science studies, asks how women's reproductive and intellectual labor are valued and devalued in various different ways through new patent law technologies. In addition, two recent patent law are struggles are examined. These include an American Civil Liberties Union case against the patenting of breast cancer gene sequences and Southern African San struggles against patents related to the Hoodia gordonii plant. In conclusion, I argue that patent law functions within gendered and ethno-racialized forms of neoliberal, biopolitics involving the patenting of women's reproductive and intellectual labor within new bioeconomics.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 19 , Special Issue 3: Intangible Property at the Periphery: Expanding Enclosure in the 21st Century , August 2012 , pp. 371 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleton, Helen, Fernandez, Maria E., Hill, Catherine L.M., and Quiroz, Consuelo. “Claiming and Using Indigenous Knowledge.” In Missing Links, edited by Group, United Nations Commission Science Technology Development Gender Working, 55–81. Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Heike. Towards a SASI Gender Strategy: Analysis and Recommendations. Kimberley: South African San Institute (SASI), 2001.Google Scholar
Becker, Heike. “The Least Sexist Society? Perspectives on Gender, Change and Violence among Southern African San.” Journal of Southern African Studies 29, no. 1 (2003): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkler, Yochai. “Through the Looking Glass: Alice and the Constitutional Foundations of the Public Domain.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66, no. 1-2 (2003): 173–224.Google Scholar
Biagioli, Mario, and Galison, Peter Louis, eds. Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Boyle, James. “Foreword: The Opposite of Property?” Law and Contemporary Problems 66, no. 1 (2003): 1–32.Google Scholar
Boyle, James. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen B., and Stabinsky, Doreen. Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. “The Geneticization of Autism: From New Reproductive Technologies to the Conception of Genetic Normalcy.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 34, no. 4 (2009): 875–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burk, Dan. “Feminism and Dualism in Intellectual Property.” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 15, no. 2 (2007): 183–206.Google Scholar
Chander, Anupam, and Sunder, Madhavi. “The Romance of the Public Domain.” California Law Review 92, no. 4 (2004): 1331–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, Beth A. “Shamans Versus Pirates in the Amazonian Treasure Chest.” American Anthropologist 104, no. 4 (2002): 1050–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J.The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J. “Fear, Hope, and Longing for the Future of Authorship and a Revitalized Public Domain in Global Regimes of Intellectual Property.” DePaul Law Review 52, no. 4 (2003): 1171–91.Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, Rochelle. “Protecting the Public Domain of Science: Has the Time for an Experimental Use Defense Arrived?” Arizona Law Review 46, no. 3 (2004): 457–72.Google Scholar
Dutfield, Graham. Intellectual Property, Biogenetic Resources, and Traditional Knowledge. London: Earthscan, 2004.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M., and Schuler, Philip, eds. Poor People's Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Foster, Laura A. “Situating Feminisms, Patent Law, and the Public Domain.” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 20, no. 2 (2011): 261–311.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah, and Roberts, Celia. Born and Made: An Ethnography of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Green, Joyce, ed. Making Space for Indigenous Feminism. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood, 2007.Google Scholar
Greene, Shane. “Indigenous People Incorporated?: Culture as Politics, Culture as Property in Pharmaceutical Bioprospecting.” Current Anthropology 45, no. 2 (2004): 211–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbert, Debora J. “Feminist Interpretations of Intellectual Property.” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 14, no. 3 (2006): 431–60.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J.Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J.Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.Femaleman_Meets_Oncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra G.Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Harry, Debra, and Kanehe, Le'a Malia. “The BS in Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS): Critical Questions for Indigenous Peoples.” In The Catch: Perspectives in Benefit Sharing, edited by Burrows, Beth, 81–120. Penang, Malaysia: Edmunds Institute/Third World Network, 2005.Google Scholar
Hayden, Cori. When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hayden, Cori. “Bioprospecting's Representational Dilemma.” Science as Culture 14, no. 2 (2005): 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynes, H. Patricia. “Toward a Laboratory of One's Own: Lesbians in Science.” Women's Studies Quarterly 28, no. 1-2 (2000): 158–64.Google Scholar
Jaimes, M. Annette, and Halsey, Theresa. “American Indian Women: At the Center of Indigenous Resistance in Contemporary North America.” In Dangerous Liaisons: Gender, Nation, and Postcolonial Perspectives, edited by McClintock, Anne, Mufti, Aamir, and Shohat, Ella, 298–329. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kane, Eileen. “Molecules and Conflict: Cancer, Patents, and Women's Health.” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 15, no. 2 (2007): 305–35.Google Scholar
Kang, Hyo Yoon. “An Exploration into Law and Narratives: The Case of Intellectual Property Law of Biotechnology.” Law Critique 17 (2006): 239–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, B. Zorina. “‘Not for Ornament’: Patenting Activity by Nineteenth-Century Women Inventors.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2 (2000): 159–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, David. “Recognizing the Public Domain.” Law and Contemporary Problems 44, no. 4 (1981): 147–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, David. “Reimagining the Public Domain.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66, no. 1-2 (2003): 463–83.Google Scholar
Litman, Jessica. “The Public Domain.” Emory Law Journal 39, no. 4 (1990): 965–1023.Google Scholar
Locke, John, and Laslett, Peter. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988. First published 1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Doris Estelle. “Traditional Knowledge and the Fight for the Public Domain.” John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law 5, no. 4 (2006): 317–29.Google Scholar
Merges, Robert P., and Duffy, John Fitzgerald. Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials, 4th ed. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis, 2007.Google Scholar
Merritt, Deborah J. “Hypatia in the Patent Office: Women Inventors and the Law, 1865–1900.” American Journal of Legal History 35, no. 3 (1991): 235–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. Talkin' Up to the White Woman: Indigenous Women and White Feminism. St Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Ouellette, Grace Josephine Mildred Wuttunee. The Fourth World: An Indigenous Perspective on Feminism and Aboriginal Women's Activism. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood, 2002.Google Scholar
Pollack, Malla. “Towards a Feminist Theory of the Public Domain, or Rejecting the Gendered Scope of United States Copyrightable and Patentable Subject Matter.” William & Mary Journal of Women and Law 12 (2006): 603–26.Google Scholar
Pottage, Alain. “The Inscription of Life in Law: Genes, Patents, and Bio-Politics.” Modern Law Review 61, no. 5 (1998): 740–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, Arti K., and Eisenberg, Rebecca S.. “Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66, no. 1-2 (2003): 289–314.Google Scholar
Reichman, J. H., and Uhlir, Paul F.. “A Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons for Scientific Data in a Highly Protectionist Intellectual Property Environment.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66, no. 1-2 (2003): 315–462.Google Scholar
Ritte, Walter, and Kanehe, Le'a Malia. “Kuleana No Holoa [Responsibility for taro]: Protecting the Sacred Ancestor from Ownership and Genetic Modification.” In Pacific Genes & Life Patents: Pacific Indigenous Experiences & Analysis of the Commodification & Ownership of Life, edited by Mead, Aroha Te Pareake and Ratuva, Steven, 114–29. Wellington, New Zealand: Call of the Earth Llamado de la Tierra and United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies, 2007.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy E. “Race, Gender, and Genetic Technologies: A New Reproductive Dystopia?” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 34, no. 4 (2009): 783–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. “Enriching Discourse on Public Domains.” Duke Law Journal 55, no. 4 (2006): 783–834.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa L.Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K.Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Boston: South End Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana, and Moser, Ingunn. Biopolitics: A Feminist and Ecological Reader on Biotechnology. London: Zed Books/Third World Network, 1995.Google Scholar
Skloot, Rebecca. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown, 2010.Google Scholar
Smith, Andrea. “Native American Feminism, Sovereignty and Social Change.” In Making Space for Indigenous Feminism, edited by Green, Joyce, 93–107. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood, 2007.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. “Cutting the Network.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2, no. 3 (1996): 517–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. “The Patent and the Malanggan.” Theory, Culture & Society 18, no. 4 (2001): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramaniam, Banu. “Snow Brown and the Seven Detergents: A Metanarrative on Science and the Scientific Method.” Women's Studies Quarterly 28, no. 1-2 (2000): 296–304.Google Scholar
Sunder, Madhavi. “The Invention of Traditional Knowledge.” Law and Contemporary Problems 70, no. 2 (2007): 97–124.Google Scholar
Sunder Rajan, Kaushik. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Swaminthan, Monkombu Sambasivan. Gender Dimensions in Biodiversity Management. Delhi: Konark, 1998.Google Scholar
Traweek, Sharon. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. African Women's Movements: Changing Political Landscapes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). “Women and Biodiversity: The Core of Existence.” In Women and the Environment, 30–48. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP, 2004.Google Scholar
Waldby, Catherine, and Cooper, Melinda. “The Biopolitics of Reproduction.” Australian Feminist Studies 23 (2008): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Kjersten Burker, and Smith-Doerr, Laurel. “Gender and Commercial Women's Patenting in the Life Sciences.” Journal of Technology Transfer 30, no. 4 (2005): 355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynberg, Rachel. “Rhetoric, Realism and Benefit Sharing: Use of Traditional Knowledge of Hoodia Species in the Development of Appetite Suppressant.” Journal of World Intellectual Property 7, no. 6 (2004): 851–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynberg, Rachel, Shroeder, Doris, and Chennels, Roger. Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing. New York: Springer, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet. “The Careers of Men and Women Scientists: Gender Differences in Career Attainment.” In Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies, edited by Wyer, Mary, 67–76. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar