Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:22:49.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary on Implications of the Genographic Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Jane Anderson
Jane Anderson
Affiliation:
Institute for Law and Society, New York University School of Law. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

First, I would like to thank George Nicholas and Julie Hollowell for inviting me to comment on this important panel discussion. Second, I would like to thank all the panelists for their articulate and highly stimulating discussion, which deftly illustrates the range of cultural, historical, and political complexities that inform not only the Genographic Project but also research conducted with Indigenous peoples and indigenous communities more generally.

Type
Commentaries
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 213 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Jane. Indigenous Knowledge and Intellectual Property: Access, Ownership and Control of Cultural Materials—Final Report. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies: Canberra, Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jane. “Practicing Reality: Indigenous Interests in Intellectual Property,” Copyright Reporter—Journal of the Copyright Society of Australia 24, 1&2 (2006): 87–97.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jane. “Access and Control of Indigenous Knowledge in Libraries and Archives: Ownership and Future Use.” Paper for Correcting Course: Rebalancing Copyright for Libraries in the National and International Arena, Columbia University. ⟨http://conservationcommons.org/media/document/docu-i64cij.pdf⟩ (May 2005) accessed 25 November 2008.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jane, and Bowrey, Kathy. “The Imaginary Politics of Access to Knowledge: Whose Cultural Agenda's are Being Advanced?” Australasian Intellectual Property Law Resources 13 (2006). Available at http:///www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/AILPRes/2006/13/html.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jane, and Koch, Grace. “The Politics of Context: Issues for Law, Researchers and the Compilation of Databases.” In Researchers, Communities, Institutions, Sound Recordings, edited by Barwick, Linda, Marrett, Allan, Simpson, Jane, and Harris, Amanda. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney, 2004.Google Scholar
Behar, Doror M., Rosser, Saharon, Blue-Smith, Jason, Balanovsky, Oleg, Tzur, Shay, Comas, David, Mitchell, R. John, Quintana-Murci, Luis, Tyler-Smith, Chris, Wells, R. Spencer, and Consortium, the Genographic. “The Genographic Project Public Participation Mitochondrial DNA Database.” PLoS Genetics 3, 6 (2007): e104 (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030104).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bregman-Eschet, Yael. “Genetic Databases and Biobanks: Who Controls Our Genetic Privacy?” bePress Legal Series 934 (2006) 1–59. Available at http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/934.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Susan M. C., Kaye, Jane, Smart, Andrew, Heeney, Catherine, and Parker, Michael. “Governing Genetic Databases: Challenges Facing Research Regulation and Practice.” Journal of Law and Society 34, no. 2 (2007): 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jane, Helgason, Hordur Helgi, Nõmper, Ants, Sild, Tarmo, and Wendel, Lotta. “Population Genetic Databases: A Comparative Analysis of the Law in Iceland, Sweden, Estonia and the UK.” Trames 8, no. 58 (2004): 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnane, Steve, and Marsh, Lauren. “Ghost Files: The Missing Files of the Department of Indigenous Affairs Archive.” In History and Native Title: Studies in Western Australia History, edited by Choo, Christine and Hollbach, Shawn. Perth, Australia: University of Western Australia, 2003. 111–127.Google Scholar