Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:54:37.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rotation and Anisotropic Losses of Mass and Angular Momentum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

André Maeder*
Affiliation:
Geneva Observatory, CH - 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The expressions of the radiative flux at the surface of a non-uniformly rotating star are revised and this leads to a small extra-term in the von Zeipel theorem. The Eddington factor needs also to be carefully defined in a rotating star, as well as the critical break-up velocity. This leads us to reconsider the so-called Ω–limit. The most massive stars reach the Ω and Г limits almost simultaneously.

We also examine the latitudinal dependence of the mass loss rates Ṁ(υ) in rotating stars and find two main effects: 1) the “geff” effect which enhances the polar ejection; 2) the “opacity effect” (or “к–effect”), which favours equatorial ejection. In O–stars, the geff effect is expected to largely dominate. In B– and later type stars the opacity effect should favour equatorial ejection and the formation of equatorial rings. Possible relations with η Carinae and the inner and outer rings of SN 1987 A are mentioned. Opacity peaks produce some extrema in Ṁ(υ) and this may also lead to the formation non-equatorial symmetrical rings.

Anisotropic stellar winds remove selectively the angular momentum. For example, winds passing through polar caps in O–stars remove very little angular momentum, an excess of angular momentum is retained and rapidly redistributed by horizontal turbulence. These excesses may lead some Wolf–Rayet stars, those resulting directly from O–stars, to be fast spinning objects, while we predict that the WR–stars which have passed through the red supergiant phase will have lower rotation velocities on the average. We also show how anisotropic ejection can be treated in numerical models by properly modifying the outer boundary conditions for the transport of angular momentum.

Type
Session VI Evolutionary Aspects
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1999

References

Burrows, C.J., Krist, J., Hester, J.J. et al. 1995, ApJ 452, 680 Google Scholar
Crotts, A.P.S., Kunkel, W.E., McCarthy, P.J. 1989, ApJ 347, L61 Google Scholar
Davidson, K. 1997, Bull. American Astron. Soc. 188, 50.04.Google Scholar
Ebbets, D.C., Walborn, N.R., Parker, J. 1997, ApJ 489, L161 Google Scholar
Heger, A., Langer, N. 1996, A&A 315, 421 Google Scholar
Kudritzki, R.P., Pauldrach, A., Puls, J., Abbott, D.C. 1989, A&A 219, 205 Google Scholar
Lamers, H.J.G.L.M. 1997, in Luminous Blue Variables: Massive Stars in Transition, ed. Nota, A., Lamers, H., ASP Conf. Ser. 120, 76 Google Scholar
Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., Snow, T.P., Lindholm, D.M. 1995, ApJ 455, 269 Google Scholar
Langer, N. 1997, in Luminous Blue Variables: Massive Stars in Transition, ed. Nota, A., Lamers, H., ASP Conf. Ser. 120, p. 83 Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 1997, A&A 321, 134 (paper II)Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 1999, A&A in press (paper IV)Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Zahn, J.P. 1998, A&A 334, 1000 (paper III)Google Scholar
Owocki, S.P., Cranmer, S.R., Gayley, K.G. 1996, ApJ 472, L115 Google Scholar
Owocki, S.P., Gayley, K.G., Cranmer, S.R. 1998, in Boulder-Munich II: Properties of Hot, Luminous Stars, ASP Conf. Ser. 131, p. 237 Google Scholar
Panagia, N., Scuderi, S., Gilmozzi, R., Challis, P.M., Garnavich, P.M., Kirshner, R.P. 1996, ApJ 459, L17 Google Scholar
Pauldrach, A., Puls, J., Kudritzki, R.P. 1986, A&A 164, 86 Google Scholar
Puls, J., Kudritzki, R.P., Herrero, A. et al. 1996, A&A 305, 171 Google Scholar
von Zeipel, H. 1924, MNRAS 84, 665 Google Scholar
Zahn, J.P. 1992, A&A 265, 115 Google Scholar