Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:20:24.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HUT Observations of the Lyman Limit in AGN: Implications for Unified Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

G. Kriss
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
J. Krolik
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
J. Grimes
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Z. Tsvetanov
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
B. Espey
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
W. Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
A. Davidsen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We observed a total of 13 low-redshift AGN with the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope (HUT) during the course of the Astro-1 and Astro-2 missions. Of these, 4 show intrinsic Lyman-limit absorption — NGC 1068, NGC 4151, NGC 3516 and NGC 3227. AU galaxies with optically thick Lyman limits have extended narrow-line regions with bi-polar morphologies. All AGN with no absorption are Seyfert Is with compact NLRs. These observations support geometrical shadowing as the means for collimating the ionizing radiation in unified models of AGN, most likely in a photoionized atmosphere above the obscuring torus.

Type
X. Unification of Active Galaxies and Other Global Issues
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1997

References

Antonucci, R. 1993, Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap., 31, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, I., et al. 1994, ASP Conf. Ser., 54, 3.Google Scholar
Krolik, J.H., & Kriss, G.A. 1995, ApJ, 447, 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, R. 1989, ApJ, 345, 730.Google Scholar