Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:00:52.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constraints on the Atmospheric Parameters of the Binary DA White Dwarf L870-2 (EG11)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

P. Bergeron ,
F. Wesemael ,
J. Liebert ,
G. Fontaine  and
P. Lacombe
P. Bergeron
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal
F. Wesemael
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal
J. Liebert
Affiliation:
Steward Observatory, University of Arizona
G. Fontaine
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal
P. Lacombe
Affiliation:
Département de Physique, Université de Montréal

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The recent discovery that the cool DA white dwarf L870-2 (EG11, WD0135-052) is a double-lined spectroscopic binary composed of a detached pair of DA white dwarfs (Saffer, Liebert, and Olszewski 1988, SLO hereafter) has raised some challenging problems for stellar evolution theories of such binary systems. One first important step in the understanding of this short-period system is to establish the atmospheric parameters of each component. SLO have argued from previous determinations of the effective temperature and absolute magnitude of the system, and also from their own study of the composite Hα profile, that the two components should be similar. We wish here to reexamine this assertion by taking a new look at the constraints on the two components brought about by the available observational data.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 114: White Dwarfs , 1989 , pp. 435 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1989

References

Bergeron, P., Vesemael, F. and Fontaine, G. 1987, in IAU Colloquium 95, The Second Conference on Faint Blue Stars, eds. Philip, A.G.D., Hayes, D.S. and Liebert, J., (Schenectady : L. Davis Press), p. 61.Google Scholar
Bergeron, P., Vesemael, F. and Fontaine, G. 1988, these Proceedings.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J., Bergeron, P., Lacombe, P., Lamontagne, R. and Talon, A. 1985, Astron. J., 90, 1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, J.L. 1985, P.A.S.P., 97, 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koester, D., Schulz, H. and Veidemann, V. 1979, Astron. Astrophys., 76, 262.Google Scholar
Lacombe, P., Liebert, J., Vesemael, F. and Fontaine, G. 1983, Asirophys. J. 272, 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCook, G.P. and Sion, E.M. 1987, Asirophys. J. Suppl., 85, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffer, R.A., Liebert, J. and Olszewski, E.M. 1988, Asirophys. J., in press.Google Scholar
Schulz, H. and Vegner, G. 1981, Astronom. Astropnys., 94, 272.Google Scholar
Shipman, H.L. 1979, Astrophys. J., 228, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winget, D.E., Lamb, D.Q. and Van Hom, H.M. 1988, in preparation.Google Scholar