Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:18:45.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Pulsation Calculations with OP and OPAL Opacities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2018

S.M. Kanbur
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE 68588-0111
N.R. Simon
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE 68588-0111

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The OPAL opacities (Iglesias and Rogers 1991; Iglesias, Rogers and Wilson 1992) are recent revisions to the traditional Los Alamos (LA) opacities and have proven very successful in resolving the Cepheid beat mass, and to a lesser extent, the Cepheid bump mass discrepancies (Moskalik, Buchler and Marom 1991, hereafter MBM). MBM showed that for the beat Cepheids the P1/P0 period ratios, calculated with OPAL, yielded solar masses between 4 and 7, in agreement with other mass determinations. MBM also found that the P2/P0 period ratios were reduced, implying higher bump Cepheid masses, though the conflict with standard evolutionary masses was not completely eliminated. We have made linear nonadiabatic pulsation calculations with another set of recently computed opacities, namely those of the Opacity Project (Seaton 1987, 1992, hereafter OP). Since the two teams have employed different techniques in their calculations, it is of interest to compare pulsation results using the two sets of opacities.

Type
Theoretical Breakthroughs
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

References

Becker, S.A., Iben, I. & Tuggle, R.S., 1977, Astrophys. J., 218, 633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiosi, C., 1989 in ‘The Use of Pulsating Stars in Fundamental Problems of Astronomy’, Cambridge University Press, p 19.Google Scholar
Iglesias, C.A., & Rogers, F.J., 1991, Astrophys. J., 371, 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias, C.A., Rogers, F.J., & Wilson, B. 1992, preprint.Google Scholar
Moskalik, P., Buchler, J. R., & Marom, A., 1992, Astrophys. J., 385, 685 (MBM).Google Scholar
Seaton, M.J., 1987, J. Phys. B., 20, 6363.Google Scholar
Seaton, M.J., private communication.Google Scholar