Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:41:12.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduced Length of Stay Using Clinical Decision Support Tool (ASAP) for Empiric Antibiotic Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2020

Mary Acree
Affiliation:
NorthShore University Health System
Kamaljit Singh
Affiliation:
NorthShore University Health System
Urmila Ravichandran
Affiliation:
NorthShore University Health System
Jennifer Grant
Affiliation:
NorthShore University Health Systems
Gary Fleming
Affiliation:
NorthShore University Health System
Bryce Hadsell
Affiliation:
NorthShore University Health System
Nirav Shah
Affiliation:
NorthShore University Health System
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Empiric antibiotic selection is challenging and requires knowledge of the local antibiogram, national guidelines and patient-specific factors, such as drug allergy and recent antibiotic exposure. Clinical decision support for empiric antibiotic selection has the potential to improve adherence to guidelines and improve patient outcomes. Methods: At NorthShore University HealthSystem, a 4-hospital, 789 bed system, an automated point-of-care decision support tool referred to as Antimicrobial Stewardship Assistance Program (ASAP) was created for empiric antibiotic selection for 4 infectious syndromes: pneumonia, skin and soft-tissue infections, urinary tract infection, and intra-abdominal infection. The tool input data from the electronic health record, which can be modified by any user. Using an algorithm created with electronic health record data, antibiogram data, and national guidelines, the tool produces an antibiotic recommendation that can be ordered via a link to order entry. If the tool identifies a patient with a high likelihood for a multidrug-resistant infection, a consultation by an infectious diseases specialist is recommended. Utilization of the tool and associated outcomes were evaluated from July 2018 to May 2019. Results: The ASAP tool was executed by 140 unique, noninfectious diseases providers 790 times. The tool was utilized most often for pneumonia (194 tool uses), followed by urinary tract infection (166 tool uses). The most common provider type to use the tool was an internal medicine hospitalist. The tool increased adherence to the recommended antibiotic regimen for each condition. Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed by an infectious diseases physician. Antibiotics were considered appropriate when they were similar to the antibiotic regimen recommended by the ASAP. Inappropriate antibiotics were classified as broad or narrow. When antibiotic coverage was appropriate, hospital length of stay was statistically significantly shorter (4.8 days vs 6.8 days for broad antibiotics vs 7.4 days for narrow antibiotics; P < .01). No significant differences were identified in mortality or readmission. Conclusions: A clinical decision support tool in the electronic health record can improve adherence to recommended empiric antibiotic therapy. Use of appropriate antibiotics recommended by such a tool can reduce hospital length of stay.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.