Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:05:30.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recommendations to Resolve Inconsistent Guidelines for the Reprocessing of Sheathed and Unsheathed Rigid Laryngoscopes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Lawrence F. Muscarella
Lawrence F. Muscarella*
Affiliation:
Custom Ultrasonics, Ivyland, Pennsylvania
*
Custom Ultrasonics, 144 Railroad Dr., Ivyland, PA 18974 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neither a consensus statement nor a formal set of step-by-step guidelines for reprocessing rigid laryngoscopes have been published or endorsed by professional organizations. Several published guidelines, standards, and clinical reports were reviewed to evaluate the risk of nosocomial infection associated with the use of rigid laryngoscopes, to determine their minimum reprocessing requirements. This review found that the recommendations of some guidelines and standards for reprocessing rigid laryngoscopes are incomplete, inadequate, and inconsistent with one another, and that current practices for reprocessing rigid laryngoscopes are reported to be inadequate and lack standardization. It is recommended that a consensus statement be developed that standardizes the reprocessing of rigid laryngoscopes and requires cleaning followed by high-level disinfection (or sterilization) and drying of the rigid laryngoscope's blade and handle to prevent nosocomial infection, regardless of whether a protective barrier or sheath is used during the procedure.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , April 2007 , pp. 504 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Association of perioperative Registered Nurses. Recommended practices for cleaning, handling, and processing anesthesia equipment. AORN J 2005;81:856–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA). Infection Control Guide, Revised. Park Ridge, IL: AANA; 1997:13–23. Available at: http://www.aana.com/Resources.aspx?ucNavMenu_TSMenuTargetID=51&ucNavMenu_TSMenuTargetType=4&ucNavMenu_TSMenuID=6&id=737. Accessed April 4, 2006.Google Scholar
3.Alvarado, CJ, Reichelderfer, M. APIC guidelines for infection prevention and control in flexible endoscopy. Association for Professionals in Infection Control. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:138–155.Google Scholar
4.Phillips, RA, Monaghan, WP. Incidence of visible and occult blood on laryngoscope blades and handles. AANA J 1997;65:241–246.Google Scholar
5.Simmons, SA. Laryngoscope handles: a potential for infection. AANA J 2000;68:233–236.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Yee, KF. Decontamination issues and perceived reliability of the laryngoscope—a clinician's perspective. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003;31:658–662.Google Scholar
7.Esler, MD, Baines, LC, Wilkinson, DJ, et al.Decontamination of laryngoscopes: a survey of national practice. Anaesthesia 1999;54:587–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Banfield, GK, Hinton, AE. A national survey of disinfection techniques for flexible nasoendoscopes in UK ENT out-patient departments. J Laryngol Otol 2000;114:202–204.Google Scholar
9.Beamer, JER. MRSA contamination of a laryngoscope blade: a potential vector for cross infection. Anaesthesia 1999;54:1010–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.White Memorial Medical Center Statement. Bacteria outbreak closes baby and children units in LA hospital. 2006. Available at: http://www.healthnews-stat.com/?id+2818dteys+Outbreak-childrens-hospit-White-Memorial-Hospital-closed-hospital. Accessed February 28, 2007.Google Scholar
11.Spaulding, EH. Chemical disinfection of medical and surgical materials. In: Lawrence, CA, Block, SS, eds. Disinfection, Sterilization and Preservation. Philadephia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1968:517–531.Google Scholar
12.Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Manufacturers Seeking Marketing Clearance of Ear, Nose, and Throat Endoscope Sheaths Used as Protective Barriers. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2000. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/guidance/954.html. Accessed February 28, 2007.Google Scholar
13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for infection control in dental health care settings, 2003. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52(RR-17):1–61. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtnu7rr5217a1.htm. Accessed April 4, 2006.Google Scholar
14.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997;46(RR-1):1–79. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00045365.htm. Accessed October 5, 2004.Google Scholar
15.Chen, YH, Wong, KL, Shieh, JP, et al.Use of condoms as blade covers during laryngoscopy, a method to reduce possible cross infection among patients. J Infect 2006;52:118–123.Google Scholar
16.Food and Drug Administration. FDA Public Health Notification: Reprocessing of Reusable Ultrasound Transducer Assemblies Used for Biopsy Procedures. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2006. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/061906-ultrasoundtransducers.html. Accessed February 28, 2007.Google Scholar