Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:14:45.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What can Marxist theories of capitalism tell us about organizational and occupational behaviors?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2020

Christopher J. Lake Open the ORCID record for Christopher J. Lake [Opens in a new window]  and
Kimberly E. Rewinkel
Christopher J. Lake*
Affiliation:
Kansas State University
Kimberly E. Rewinkel
Affiliation:
Kansas State University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 479 - 481
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C., & Barratt, C. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 613–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1241–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engels, F. (1969/1998). The condition of the working class in England. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/condition-working-class-england.pdf.Google Scholar
Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, C. J., Highhouse, S., & Shrift, A. G. (2018). Validation of the job-hopping motives scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 26, 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, S. T., Schweitzer, L., & Ng, E. S. W. (2015). Resilience in the modern career. Career Development International, 20, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1887/2015). Capital (Vol. I). S. Moore & E. Aveling (Trans.). Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf.Google Scholar
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1888/1978). Manifesto of the Communist party. In Tucker, R. C. (Ed.), The Marx-Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 473–500). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Mumby, D. K. (2019). Work: What is it good for? (Absolutely nothing)—a critical theorist’s perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(4), 429–443.Google Scholar
Worsley, P. (2002). Marx and Marxism (rev. ed.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wrzesniewski, A., LoBulgio, N., Dutton, J. E., & Berg, J. M. (2013). Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity at work. Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology, 1, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar