Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T01:28:14.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial–Organizational and Strategy Are Integrated in Practice!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Ramon M. Henson
Ramon M. Henson*
Affiliation:
Henson Consulting International and Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Henson Consulting International, 11 Mayflower Court, Somerset, NJ 08873
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 82 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beer, M. (2009). High commitment, high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
Bjelland, O., & Wood, R. (2008). An inside view of IBM's innovation jam. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 31–40. Google Scholar
Bossidy, L., & Charan, R. (2002). Execution: the discipline of getting things done. New York, NY: Crown Business. Google Scholar
Boudreau, J., & Ramstad, P. (2007). Beyond HR. Boston, MA: Harvard Business. Google Scholar
Bridges, W. (2009). Managing transitions: Making the most of change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: DeCapo Books. Google Scholar
Cober, R., Silzer, R., & Erickson, A. (2009a). Science–practice gaps in industrial-organizational psychology, part I. Member data and perspectives. The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 47, 97–105. Google Scholar
Cober, R., Silzer, R., & Erickson, A. (2009b). Science–practice gaps in industrial-organizational psychology, part II. Perspectives of experienced I–O practitioners and researchers. The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 47, 103–113. Google Scholar
Conner, D. (1993). Managing at the speed of change. New York, NY: Random House. Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. (2001). Designing organizations. New York, NY: Pfeiffer. Google Scholar
Hammer, M., & Stanton, A. (1995). The reengineering revolution. New York, NY: Harper Business. Google Scholar
Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71–79. Google Scholar
Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press. Google Scholar
Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1984). Designing strategic human resource management systems. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 36–52. 10.1016/0090-2616(84)90030-5Google Scholar
Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9, 35–51. 10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-XGoogle Scholar
Noe, R., Hollenbeck, J., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. (2010). Human resource management (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E. (2012). The psychology of competitive advantage: An adjacent possibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Research and Practice, 5, 62–81. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01407.xGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing competitors and industries. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar
Schuler, R., & Jackson, S. (1987). Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 207–219. Google Scholar