Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:27:59.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Male Friendship and Intimacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Robert A. Strikwerda  and
Larry May
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our primary focus is the concept of intimacy, especially in the context of adult American male relationships. We begin with an examination of comradeship, a nonintimate form of friendship, then develop an account of the nature and value of intimacy in friendship. We follow this with discussions of obstacles to intimacy and of Aristotle's views. In the final section, we discuss the process of men attaining intimacy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Summer 1992 , pp. 110 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, . 1925. Magna mordia, trans. Stock, St. George. Vol. 9 of The works of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1941. Nicomachean ethics, trans. Ross, W. D. In The basic works of Aristotle, ed. McKeon, Richard. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1985. Nicomachean ethics, trans. Irwin, Terence. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Bing, Stanley. 1989. No man is an isthmus. Esquire (August): 51–53.Google Scholar
Brittain, Vera. 1947. Testament of friendship: The story of Winifred Holtby. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cook, Blanche Wiesen. 1977. Female support networks and political activism: Lillian Wald, Crystal Eastman, and Emma Goldman. Chrysalis 3: 43–61.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M. 1977. Friendship and the good in Aristotle. Philosophical Review 86(3): 290–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1978. Gynlecology. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Duck, Steve, and Pond, Kris. 1989. Friends, Romans, countrymen: Rhetoric and reality in personal relationships. In Close relationships, ed. Hendrick, Clyde. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dupre, John. 1990. Global versus local perspectives on sexual difference. In Theoretical perspectives on sexual difference, ed. Rhode, Deborah. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Easterling, Pat. 1989. Friendship and the Greeks. In The dialectics of friendship, ed. Porter, Roy and Tomaselli, Sylvana. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gray, J. Glenn. 1959. The Warriors. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1989. After the end of ‘philosophy.’ Paper presented at Matchette Conference at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Who knows? Identities and feminist epistemology. In (En)gendering knowledge: Feminists in academe, ed. Messer‐Davidow, Ellen and Hartman, Joan. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Michael ed., 1987. Beyond patriarchy. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard, and Daly, Richard. 1987. Man's domination and woman's oppression: The question of origins. In Beyond patriarchy, ed. Kaufman, Michael. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Little, Roger. 1981. Friendships in the military community. In Friendship. Vol. 2 of Research in the interweave of social roles, eds. Lopata, Helena Znaniecka and Maines, David. Greenwich, CN: JA1 Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Barry. 1989. Adult friendships. In Person to person, eds. Graham, George and LaFollette, Hugh. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
May, Larry. 1992. Insensitivity and moral responsibility. Journal of Value Inquiry, 26: 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Larry, and Strikwerda, Robert. 1991. Fatherhood and nurturance. Journal of Social Philosophy 22(2): 28–39.10.1111/j.1467-9833.1991.tb00035.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, Judith. 1987. Walking the tightrope of feminism and male desire. In Men in feminism, eds. Jardine, Alice and Smith, Paul. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
De Montaigne, Michel. 1958. On friendship. In Essays, trans. Cohen, J. M.Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Philipsen, Gerry. 1975. Speaking ‘like a man’ in Teamsterville: Cultural patterns of role enactment in an urban neighborhood. Quarterly Journal of Speech 61: 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogrebin, Letty Cottin. 1987. Among friends. New York: McGraw‐Hill.Google Scholar
Pollak, Susan, and Gilligan, Carol. 1982. Images of violence in thematic apperception test stories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 159–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, Lillian B. 1983. Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Sattel, Jack W. 1976. The inexpressive male: Tragedy or sexual politics? Social Problems 23(4): 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schifellite, Carmen. 1987. Beyond Tarzan and Jane genes: Toward a critique of biological determinism. In Beyond patriarchy, ed. Kaufman, Michael. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherrod, Drury. 1989. The influence of gender on same‐sex friendships. In Close relationships, ed. Hendrick, Clyde. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Walker, Alice. 1989. The temple of my familiar. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Wall, Shavaun M., Pickert, Sarah M., and Paradise, Louis V. 1984. American men's friendships: Self‐reports on meaning and change. Journal of Psychology 116(2): 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar