Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:57:27.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distending Straight‐Masculine Time: A Phenomenology of the Disabled Speaking Body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2014

Joshua St. Pierre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing upon feminist, queer, and crip phenomenology, this essay argues that the distinct temporality of the lived, stuttering body disturbs the normalized “choreography” of communication and thereby threatens the disabled speaker's recognition as a speaking subject. Examined through the phenomenology of Maurice Merleau‐Ponty and Alfred Schutz, the disabled speaking body is temporally “out of step” with the normalized bodily rhythms and pace of communicative practices in relation to both lived and objective time. Disciplined for his incalculable and therefore irrational bodily choreography, the disabled speaker is foregrounded against an objective, instrumentally ordered world constituted by a disembodied and hegemonic “straight‐masculine” time. Although dominant communicative choreographies may often be unlivable for disabled speakers, cripping communicative time rejects the cardinal value of futurity and invites interlocutors to gather in a noninstrumentalized and nonproductive present. This reshaping of communicative space enacts new modes of relationality and opens up an array of communicative futures suppressed or cut off by straight‐masculine time.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 1: Special Issue: New Conversations in Feminist Disability Studies , Winter 2015 , pp. 49 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I greatly appreciate the many people who provided invaluable feedback on drafts of this paper: Marie‐Eve Morin, Charis St. Pierre, Lindsay Eales, Rob Wilson, Kristin Rodier, Emily Parker, Cressida Heyes, Kim Hall, and the two Hypatia reviewers.

References

Adam, Barbara. 1995. Timewatch: The social analysis of time. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Cavarero, Adriana. 2005. For more than one voice: Toward a philosophy of vocal expression. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Crossley, Nick. 1996. Intersubjectivity: The fabric of social becoming. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dolmage, Jay Timothy. 2013. Disability rhetoric. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Eagle, Christopher. 2011. Organic hesitancies: Stuttering and sexuality in Melville, Kesey, and Mishima. Comparative Literature Studies 48 (2): 200–18.Google Scholar
Eagle, Christopher, ed. 2013. Literature, speech disorders, and disability: Talking normal. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lee. 2004. No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 2005. In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hass, Lawrence. 2008. Merleau‐Ponty's philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jezer, Marty. 1997. Stuttering: A life bound up in words. Toronto: Harper Collins Canada/Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1973. Grundisse. London: Allen Lane, New Left Review.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of perception. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muldoon, Mark. 2006. Tricks of time: Bergson, Merleau‐Ponty and Ricoeur in search of time, self and meaning. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Paterson, Kevin. 2012. It's about time!: Understanding the experience of speech impairment. In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, ed. Watson, Nick, Roulstone, Alan, and Thomas, Carol. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peeters, Benoit. 2012. Derrida: A biography. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 2006. Nature of the linguistic sign. In The critical tradition: Classic texts and contemporary trends, ed. Richter, David H. New York: Bedford Books.Google Scholar
Schües, Christina. 2011. The power of time: Temporal experiences and a‐temporal thinking? In Time in feminist phenomenology, ed. Schües, Christina, Olkowski, Dorothea E., and Fielding, Helen A. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. 1974. Collected papers I: The problem of social reality, ed. van Breda, H. L. and Natanson, M. A. Hingham, Mass.: Kluwer Boston, Inc.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. 1976. Collected papers II: Studies in social theory, ed. Brodersen, Arvid. Hingham, Mass.: Kluwer Boston, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Pierre, Joshua. 2012. The construction of the disabled speaker: Locating stuttering in disability studies. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 1 (3): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1996. Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar