No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2014
This essay examines an approach to teaching theology in which “asking and feeling” are equally important concerns. It is argued that courses in theology can be structured in ways that eliminate the cognitive-affective dichotomy, while providing experiences whose motivational appeal enhances dialogue and the prospect of individual growth. Special attention is given to: (1) ways of structuring the classroom experience so that students become responsible for their own learning; (2) activities designed to enhance the self-concept; and (3) methods for developing interpersonal communication skills that promote effective group discussion.
1 The English word, prejudice, has a pejorative connotation. The Latin term, praejudicium can be understood both positively and negatively. There are legitimate prejudices, although such a view is foreign to our present day use of the word. See Gadamer, Hans Georg, Truth and Method (New York: Seabury, 1975), p. 240.Google Scholar
2 Whitehead, Alfred North, The Aims of Education (New York: Free Press, 1967), p. 37.Google Scholar
3 Fox, Matthew, “Religious Education as Symbol-Making,” Notre Dame Journal of Education 5 (1974), 238.Google Scholar
4 McGill, William J., “A Prologemenon to Humanistic Learning,” Liberal Education 60 (1974), 250.Google Scholar See McDaniel, Thomas R., “The Cognitive and Affective in Liberal Education: Can We Have Both?” Liberal Education 62 (1976), 465–71Google Scholar, and Abba, Raymond, “Athens and Jerusalem: Religious Studies in the Secular University,” Religious Education 70 (1975), 355–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 McGill, p. 251.
6 Garrison, Roger H., “The Tools of the Teaching Trade,” Improving College and University Teaching 24 (1976), 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See Bruner, Jerome, The Process of Education (New York: Vintage, 1963)Google Scholar, chapter 2.
7 Freire, Paulo, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York: Herder & Herder, 1972), p. 57.Google Scholar
8 Penticuff, Joy, “Development of the Concept of Self: Implications for the Teacher's Role in Promotion of Mental Health,” Educational Horizons 55 (1976), 15–18.Google Scholar
9 Ibid., p. 17.
10 Hause, Richard G., “Humane Teaching,” Improving College and University Teaching 23 (1975), 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Perkey, W. W., “The Task of the Teacher,” in The Helping Relationship Sourcebook, Avila, D. L.et al., eds. (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc., 1971), p. 256.Google Scholar
12 Kamel, Sajed, “The Nature of Dialogue in Humanistic Education,” Journal of Education 157 (1975), 9.Google Scholar
13 Ibid., p. 8.
14 Freire, p. 79.
15 Lavaroni, Charles, “Implementing the Humanistic Curriculum in the Classroom,” Thrust for Educational Leadership 5 (1976), 28.Google Scholar
16 Worsley, Alice F., “Improving Classroom Discussion: Ten Principles,” Improving College and University Teaching 23 (1975), 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See Postman, Neil and Weingartner, Charles, Teaching As A Subversive Activity (New York: Delacorte, 1969)Google Scholar, chapter II.
17 Lavaroni, p. 27.
18 Ibid. See Rogers, Carl, Freedom to Learn (Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill, 1969)Google Scholar, chapter 4.
19 Lavaroni, p. 28. See Raths, Louis, Harmin, Merrill, and Simon, Sidney, Values and Teaching (Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill, 1966)Google Scholar, chapter 5.
20 Worsley, p. 27. For an excellent overview of communication strategies, see Johnson, David, Reaching Out (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972).Google Scholar
21 Bowman, James S., “The Lecture-Discussion Format Revisited,” Improving College and University Teaching 27 (1979), 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Bowman, p. 27. Teachers who face large classes might consult the following articles in Improving College and University Teaching: Wick, John W., “Making a Big Lecture Section a Good Course,” 22 (1974), 249–52Google Scholar; Frederick, Peter J., “The American Dream and Educational Innovation,” 23 (1975), 133–44Google Scholar; and Bazeli, Frank P., “Learning Team Approach to Large Group Instruction,” 26 (1978), 201–02.Google Scholar